中国卫生产业
中國衛生產業
중국위생산업
CHINA HEALTH INDUSTRY
2014年
18期
28-29,32
,共3页
四肢创伤合并大面积皮肤软组织缺损%负压封闭引流术
四肢創傷閤併大麵積皮膚軟組織缺損%負壓封閉引流術
사지창상합병대면적피부연조직결손%부압봉폐인류술
Limbs trauma patients with large area skin and soft tissue defect%Vacuum sealing drainage
目的：研究分析四肢创伤合并大面积皮肤软组织缺损采用负压封闭引流术治疗的临床效果。方法选取我院52例患者，并按照住院尾号将其分为治疗组（负压封闭引流术）和对照组（常规换药），均为26例，对比两组患者手术时间、住院时间、换药次数、植皮成活率及并发症发生率。结果治疗组患者受伤至Ⅱ期手术时间（10.47±2.13）d，住院时间（22.23±3.41）d，换药次数（4.31±1.52）次，植皮成活率96.15%，出现并发症发生率7.69%均同对照组患者（15.32±4.41）d、（31.65±6.03）d、（18.34±5.17）次、80.77%、30.77%间存在显著差异性，有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论负压封闭引流术在治疗四肢创伤合并大面积皮肤软组织缺损疾病临床上效果显著。
目的：研究分析四肢創傷閤併大麵積皮膚軟組織缺損採用負壓封閉引流術治療的臨床效果。方法選取我院52例患者，併按照住院尾號將其分為治療組（負壓封閉引流術）和對照組（常規換藥），均為26例，對比兩組患者手術時間、住院時間、換藥次數、植皮成活率及併髮癥髮生率。結果治療組患者受傷至Ⅱ期手術時間（10.47±2.13）d，住院時間（22.23±3.41）d，換藥次數（4.31±1.52）次，植皮成活率96.15%，齣現併髮癥髮生率7.69%均同對照組患者（15.32±4.41）d、（31.65±6.03）d、（18.34±5.17）次、80.77%、30.77%間存在顯著差異性，有統計學意義（P＜0.05）。結論負壓封閉引流術在治療四肢創傷閤併大麵積皮膚軟組織缺損疾病臨床上效果顯著。
목적：연구분석사지창상합병대면적피부연조직결손채용부압봉폐인류술치료적림상효과。방법선취아원52례환자，병안조주원미호장기분위치료조（부압봉폐인류술）화대조조（상규환약），균위26례，대비량조환자수술시간、주원시간、환약차수、식피성활솔급병발증발생솔。결과치료조환자수상지Ⅱ기수술시간（10.47±2.13）d，주원시간（22.23±3.41）d，환약차수（4.31±1.52）차，식피성활솔96.15%，출현병발증발생솔7.69%균동대조조환자（15.32±4.41）d、（31.65±6.03）d、（18.34±5.17）차、80.77%、30.77%간존재현저차이성，유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。결론부압봉폐인류술재치료사지창상합병대면적피부연조직결손질병림상상효과현저。
Objective To study the analysis of limb trauma merge large area skin and soft tissue defect by the clinical effect of closed negative pressure drainage treatment. Methods Selecting 52 patients with patients, and according to the private hospital will be divided into the treatment group (closed negative pressure drainage) and control group (routine treatment), are all 26 cases, compared two groups of patients with operation time, hospitalization time, switching frequency, skin graft survival rate and the inci-dence of complications. Results The treatment group patients with injury to Ⅱperiod (10.47±2.13 mm) d operation time, length of hospital stay (22.23±3.41) d, switching frequency (4.31±1.52) times, skin graft survival rate 96.15%, the incidence of complications of 7.69% patients with the control group (15.32±4.41) d,(4.41±6.03)d, (18.34±5.17) times and 80.77%, 30.77% there is signifi-cant difference between, with statistical significance(P<0.05). Conclusion The closed negative pressure drainage in the treatment of limb trauma with large area skin and soft tissure defect diseases clinically effective.
