中国卫生产业
中國衛生產業
중국위생산업
CHINA HEALTH INDUSTRY
2014年
19期
14-15,18
,共3页
经阴道子宫肌瘤剔除术%腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术%开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术%子宫肌瘤剔除术
經陰道子宮肌瘤剔除術%腹腔鏡子宮肌瘤剔除術%開腹子宮肌瘤剔除術%子宮肌瘤剔除術
경음도자궁기류척제술%복강경자궁기류척제술%개복자궁기류척제술%자궁기류척제술
Vaginal myomectomy%Laparoscopic myomectomy%Open myomectomy%Myomectomy
目的:分析比较开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术、腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术及经阴道子宫肌瘤剔除术的临床疗效。方法选择于2010年3月-2014年1月来我院治疗子宫肌瘤的63例妇女作为研究对象,将其随机分为三组,每组21例,分别采用开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术、腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术及经阴道子宫肌瘤剔除术进行治疗,然后观察对比三组患者的临床疗效。结果三组患者中,腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术的临床有效率最高,为95.2%,开腹式子宫肌瘤剔除术的临床有效率最低为80.9%,阴式子宫肌瘤剔除术的临床有效率为90.4%,腹腔镜和阴式组与开腹式手术方法相比具有显著型差异(P<0.05);腹腔镜组和经阴道组在手术术后的排气时间、手术过程中得出血量以及术后住院天数均低于腹式组,具有统计学意义(P<0.05),腹腔镜组和经阴道组相比无显著性差异(P>0.05);开腹组的手术时间显著短于腹腔镜组和经阴道组(P<0.05),而腹腔镜组和经阴道组比较无显著性差异(P>0.05);经阴道子宫肌瘤剔除术的复发率最低,显著低于腹腔镜和开腹子宫组,而腹腔镜和开腹子宫组比较无显著性差异。结论三种子宫肌瘤剔除术各有自己的优缺点,腹腔镜和经阴道剔除的创伤小,开腹手术的手术时间短,需要结合患者的疾病状况以及医院的设备条件来选择手术方法。
目的:分析比較開腹子宮肌瘤剔除術、腹腔鏡子宮肌瘤剔除術及經陰道子宮肌瘤剔除術的臨床療效。方法選擇于2010年3月-2014年1月來我院治療子宮肌瘤的63例婦女作為研究對象,將其隨機分為三組,每組21例,分彆採用開腹子宮肌瘤剔除術、腹腔鏡子宮肌瘤剔除術及經陰道子宮肌瘤剔除術進行治療,然後觀察對比三組患者的臨床療效。結果三組患者中,腹腔鏡子宮肌瘤剔除術的臨床有效率最高,為95.2%,開腹式子宮肌瘤剔除術的臨床有效率最低為80.9%,陰式子宮肌瘤剔除術的臨床有效率為90.4%,腹腔鏡和陰式組與開腹式手術方法相比具有顯著型差異(P<0.05);腹腔鏡組和經陰道組在手術術後的排氣時間、手術過程中得齣血量以及術後住院天數均低于腹式組,具有統計學意義(P<0.05),腹腔鏡組和經陰道組相比無顯著性差異(P>0.05);開腹組的手術時間顯著短于腹腔鏡組和經陰道組(P<0.05),而腹腔鏡組和經陰道組比較無顯著性差異(P>0.05);經陰道子宮肌瘤剔除術的複髮率最低,顯著低于腹腔鏡和開腹子宮組,而腹腔鏡和開腹子宮組比較無顯著性差異。結論三種子宮肌瘤剔除術各有自己的優缺點,腹腔鏡和經陰道剔除的創傷小,開腹手術的手術時間短,需要結閤患者的疾病狀況以及醫院的設備條件來選擇手術方法。
목적:분석비교개복자궁기류척제술、복강경자궁기류척제술급경음도자궁기류척제술적림상료효。방법선택우2010년3월-2014년1월래아원치료자궁기류적63례부녀작위연구대상,장기수궤분위삼조,매조21례,분별채용개복자궁기류척제술、복강경자궁기류척제술급경음도자궁기류척제술진행치료,연후관찰대비삼조환자적림상료효。결과삼조환자중,복강경자궁기류척제술적림상유효솔최고,위95.2%,개복식자궁기류척제술적림상유효솔최저위80.9%,음식자궁기류척제술적림상유효솔위90.4%,복강경화음식조여개복식수술방법상비구유현저형차이(P<0.05);복강경조화경음도조재수술술후적배기시간、수술과정중득출혈량이급술후주원천수균저우복식조,구유통계학의의(P<0.05),복강경조화경음도조상비무현저성차이(P>0.05);개복조적수술시간현저단우복강경조화경음도조(P<0.05),이복강경조화경음도조비교무현저성차이(P>0.05);경음도자궁기류척제술적복발솔최저,현저저우복강경화개복자궁조,이복강경화개복자궁조비교무현저성차이。결론삼충자궁기류척제술각유자기적우결점,복강경화경음도척제적창상소,개복수술적수술시간단,수요결합환자적질병상황이급의원적설비조건래선택수술방법。
Objective To investigate and discuss the clinical curative effect of abdominal myomectomy , laparoscopic myomectomy and vaginal myomectomy.Methods We selected 63 cases of women who were treated for uterine fibroids from March 2010 to Jan-uary 2014 in our hospital as research subjects ,and they were randomly divided into three groups , each group has 21 cases ,using abdominal myomectomy, laparoscopic myomectomy and vaginal myomectomy for treatment respectively, and then compare the clin-ical efficacy of the three groups. Results Laparoscopic myomectomy has the highest efficacy, 95.2%,open myomectomy surgery has minimum efficacy ,80.9%;the postoperative time ,the bleeding volume during surgery and postoperative hospital stay laparoscopic group and vaginal surgery group were lower than open group ,and the differences were statistical significant (P<0.05), there was no significant difference when compared the laparoscopic group with vaginal group (P>0.05 ) ; the operation time of open surgery group was significantly shorter than the laparoscopic group and the vaginal group (P<0.05), whereas there was no significant differ-ence between the laparoscopic group and the vaginal group (P>0.05);The recurrence rate of the vaginal myomectomy group was sig-nificantly lower than the laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy group(P<0.05) , but there was no significant difference between laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy group (P>0.05). Conclusion Each of the three myomectomy surgical treatment has their own advantages and disadvantages, laparoscopic and vaginal myomectomy have small excluding trauma,while open laparotomy has the shortest operation time, it depends on the patients status and the equipment conditions of the hospital to choose the surgical methods .