中国基层医药
中國基層醫藥
중국기층의약
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRIMARY MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2013年
z2期
13-15
,共3页
叶宜根%陈渊青%罗红%吴成秋%雷雁凌
葉宜根%陳淵青%囉紅%吳成鞦%雷雁凌
협의근%진연청%라홍%오성추%뢰안릉
妇幼保健中心%社区医学%评价研究%秩和检验
婦幼保健中心%社區醫學%評價研究%秩和檢驗
부유보건중심%사구의학%평개연구%질화검험
Maternity and child health center%Community medicine%Evaluation study%Rank test
目的:了解社区妇幼卫生评价指标体系的建立方法及深圳市的社区妇幼卫生情况,探讨秩和比法在社区妇幼卫生评价指标体系建立过程中指标权重评价的应用。方法对预先拟定的深圳市社区妇幼卫生评价指标体系使用专家咨询法对问卷咨询的信度,效度,专家权威系数、积极系数和协调系数等进行可靠性分析,然后使用综合指数法和界值法进行指标筛选,使用秩和比法对各级指标的权重进行评价。最后对指标体系进行实际测量检验,使用线性加权法对指标体系进行综合评价,然后从可操作性,以及权数的合理性和稳定性上对全部指标体系进行检验。结果两次专家问卷咨询调查的克朗巴赫α系数分别为0.9688和0畅9866,相应的专家积极系数分别为93.12%和96.18%,协调系数分别为0.40和0.28(均P>0.05),专家权威系数为0.928。根据深圳市10个区615个社区的实际测量检验表明,经过专家两次评定的妇幼卫生评价指标体系的稳定性,合理性和可操作性都令人比较满意。结论经过检验和秩和比法( RSR)应用证明,该指标评价体系的层次科学,数量合理,指标权重稳定,相关定义准确,涵盖面比较广,基本能够对深圳市的社区妇幼卫生工作的相关方面进行有效的评价和监督。
目的:瞭解社區婦幼衛生評價指標體繫的建立方法及深圳市的社區婦幼衛生情況,探討秩和比法在社區婦幼衛生評價指標體繫建立過程中指標權重評價的應用。方法對預先擬定的深圳市社區婦幼衛生評價指標體繫使用專傢咨詢法對問捲咨詢的信度,效度,專傢權威繫數、積極繫數和協調繫數等進行可靠性分析,然後使用綜閤指數法和界值法進行指標篩選,使用秩和比法對各級指標的權重進行評價。最後對指標體繫進行實際測量檢驗,使用線性加權法對指標體繫進行綜閤評價,然後從可操作性,以及權數的閤理性和穩定性上對全部指標體繫進行檢驗。結果兩次專傢問捲咨詢調查的剋朗巴赫α繫數分彆為0.9688和0暢9866,相應的專傢積極繫數分彆為93.12%和96.18%,協調繫數分彆為0.40和0.28(均P>0.05),專傢權威繫數為0.928。根據深圳市10箇區615箇社區的實際測量檢驗錶明,經過專傢兩次評定的婦幼衛生評價指標體繫的穩定性,閤理性和可操作性都令人比較滿意。結論經過檢驗和秩和比法( RSR)應用證明,該指標評價體繫的層次科學,數量閤理,指標權重穩定,相關定義準確,涵蓋麵比較廣,基本能夠對深圳市的社區婦幼衛生工作的相關方麵進行有效的評價和鑑督。
목적:료해사구부유위생평개지표체계적건립방법급심수시적사구부유위생정황,탐토질화비법재사구부유위생평개지표체계건립과정중지표권중평개적응용。방법대예선의정적심수시사구부유위생평개지표체계사용전가자순법대문권자순적신도,효도,전가권위계수、적겁계수화협조계수등진행가고성분석,연후사용종합지수법화계치법진행지표사선,사용질화비법대각급지표적권중진행평개。최후대지표체계진행실제측량검험,사용선성가권법대지표체계진행종합평개,연후종가조작성,이급권수적합이성화은정성상대전부지표체계진행검험。결과량차전가문권자순조사적극랑파혁α계수분별위0.9688화0창9866,상응적전가적겁계수분별위93.12%화96.18%,협조계수분별위0.40화0.28(균P>0.05),전가권위계수위0.928。근거심수시10개구615개사구적실제측량검험표명,경과전가량차평정적부유위생평개지표체계적은정성,합이성화가조작성도령인비교만의。결론경과검험화질화비법( RSR)응용증명,해지표평개체계적층차과학,수량합리,지표권중은정,상관정의준학,함개면비교엄,기본능구대심수시적사구부유위생공작적상관방면진행유효적평개화감독。
Objective The community MCH situation understanding method to establish evaluation index system of community maternal and child health in Shenzhen city ,to explore the application of rank and the establish-ment of evaluation index system of weights in the evaluation process than the method in community maternal and child health care .Methods The use of expert consultation questionnaire reliability , on the advice of the predetermined Shenzhen city community maternal and child health evaluation index system of validity ,reliability analysis expert au-thority coefficient,positive coefficient and the coordination coefficient ,and then use the synthetic index method and critical value method to filter the index ,using the method of rank sum ratio to evaluate the weight of each index .Fi-nally the actual measurement test of the index system ,using the linear weighted method to evaluate the index system , and then from the maneuverability ,and rationality and stability of all the indicators weight test .Results After the a-nalysis shows,Krone Bach alpha coefficient two expert questionnairesurvey were 0.9688 and 0.9866,the reliability and validity of the questionnairesare very good ,the positive coefficient of experts were 93.12%and 96.18%,the co-ordination coefficient were 0.40 and 0.28 (all P>0.05),expert authority coefficient of 0.928.According to the actu-al measurement test of 10 District of Shenzhen City ,615 community that ,through expert assessment of stability of two maternal and child health evaluation index system , the rationality and maneuverability are satisfactory .Conclusion After the inspection and RSR evaluation of certificate ,level of science ,the reasonable quantity of the evaluation index system,index weight stability,related to the definition of accuracy ,broad coverage,basic to the relevant aspects of community maternal and child health services in Shenzhen city .The evaluation and supervision .