中国医药导刊
中國醫藥導刊
중국의약도간
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GUIDE
2014年
7期
1121-1122
,共2页
王慧%韩玉杰%张立新%赵俊香
王慧%韓玉傑%張立新%趙俊香
왕혜%한옥걸%장립신%조준향
宫颈长度%早产%分娩方式%产程监测
宮頸長度%早產%分娩方式%產程鑑測
궁경장도%조산%분면방식%산정감측
B-ultrasound%Cervical length%preterm%Delivery mode%Production process monitoring
目的:探讨B超测量宫颈形态学指标预测早产及分娩方式的关系。方法:收集2011年1月~2012年12月在我院检查的单胎和双胎初产妇246例,年龄20~40岁,平均年龄(30±10)岁,孕龄24~37周。以分娩结局随机分为3组,足月分娩组(A组)246例,早产组(B组)246例,先兆早产组(C组)246例。A组以宫颈长度分娩方式:>36mm组(D组)62例,<36mm组(E组)122例。孕期内常规超声观察宫颈形态变化,测量宫颈长度,并随访妊娠结局。结果:A组产妇平均宫颈长度显著大于B组(P<0.01)和C组(P<0.01),C组平均宫颈长度显著大于B组(P<0.01);产妇剖宫产率: E组明显小于D组(P<0.01)。结论:宫颈长度可作为预测早产和剖宫产的可行性指标。
目的:探討B超測量宮頸形態學指標預測早產及分娩方式的關繫。方法:收集2011年1月~2012年12月在我院檢查的單胎和雙胎初產婦246例,年齡20~40歲,平均年齡(30±10)歲,孕齡24~37週。以分娩結跼隨機分為3組,足月分娩組(A組)246例,早產組(B組)246例,先兆早產組(C組)246例。A組以宮頸長度分娩方式:>36mm組(D組)62例,<36mm組(E組)122例。孕期內常規超聲觀察宮頸形態變化,測量宮頸長度,併隨訪妊娠結跼。結果:A組產婦平均宮頸長度顯著大于B組(P<0.01)和C組(P<0.01),C組平均宮頸長度顯著大于B組(P<0.01);產婦剖宮產率: E組明顯小于D組(P<0.01)。結論:宮頸長度可作為預測早產和剖宮產的可行性指標。
목적:탐토B초측량궁경형태학지표예측조산급분면방식적관계。방법:수집2011년1월~2012년12월재아원검사적단태화쌍태초산부246례,년령20~40세,평균년령(30±10)세,잉령24~37주。이분면결국수궤분위3조,족월분면조(A조)246례,조산조(B조)246례,선조조산조(C조)246례。A조이궁경장도분면방식:>36mm조(D조)62례,<36mm조(E조)122례。잉기내상규초성관찰궁경형태변화,측량궁경장도,병수방임신결국。결과:A조산부평균궁경장도현저대우B조(P<0.01)화C조(P<0.01),C조평균궁경장도현저대우B조(P<0.01);산부부궁산솔: E조명현소우D조(P<0.01)。결론:궁경장도가작위예측조산화부궁산적가행성지표。
Objective:To investigate the B-ultrasound Measurement of cervical and morphological predictor of preterm delivery mode of relationship. Methods:January 2011~December 2012 in our hospital to check tires and twin single Primipara 246 cases, aged 20 to 40 years, mean age (30 ± 10) years of age, 24 to 37 weeks gestational age. In birth outcomes were randomly divided into three groups, term delivery group (A) 246 cases of preterm group (group B) 246 cases of threatened preterm labor group (group C) 246 cases. A group with cervical length delivery mode:>36mm (group D) 62 cases,<36mm group (E) of 122 cases. Routine ultrasound during pregnancy cervical morphological changes observed, the measurement of cervical length and fol ow-up pregnancy outcome. Results:A group of mothers was signiifcantly greater than the average cervical length group B (P<0.01) and group C (P<0.01), group C was signiifcantly greater than the average cervical length group B (P<0.01);maternal cesarean section rate:E were signiifcantly Smal er D group (P<0.01). Conclusions:Cervical length as a predictor of preterm delivery and cesarean feasibility indicators.