国际护理学杂志
國際護理學雜誌
국제호이학잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING
2014年
7期
1623-1625
,共3页
家庭参与护理模式%颅脑损伤%癫痫
傢庭參與護理模式%顱腦損傷%癲癇
가정삼여호리모식%로뇌손상%전간
Family participating care model%Brain injury%Epilepsy
目的:探讨家庭参与护理模式对颅脑损伤后癫痫患者的预后效果。方法选取我院2012年5月至2013年6月收治的60例颅脑损伤后癫痫患者为研究对象,分为观察组和对照组各30例,观察组采用家庭参与护理模式,对照组采用常规护理措施,比较两组患者的护理效果。结果护理后,观察组患者的SAS、SDS评分分别为(25.6±4.5)分、(15.6±5.6)分,均较对照组患者出现了明显改善,组间比较差异有统计学意义( P<0.05);观察组患者定期检查率、规范用药率、社会活动率分别为90.00%、90.00%、100.00%,均明显高于对照组患者,差异有统计学意义( P<0.05);而观察组患者的复发率为13.33%,明显低于对照组患者,差异有统计学意义( P<0.05)。结论家庭参与护理模式对颅脑损伤后癫痫患者具有十分重要的意义,较大程度上缓解患者的不良情绪,促进患者的治疗依从性,降低复发率,有利于患者的预后恢复,值得临床应用。
目的:探討傢庭參與護理模式對顱腦損傷後癲癇患者的預後效果。方法選取我院2012年5月至2013年6月收治的60例顱腦損傷後癲癇患者為研究對象,分為觀察組和對照組各30例,觀察組採用傢庭參與護理模式,對照組採用常規護理措施,比較兩組患者的護理效果。結果護理後,觀察組患者的SAS、SDS評分分彆為(25.6±4.5)分、(15.6±5.6)分,均較對照組患者齣現瞭明顯改善,組間比較差異有統計學意義( P<0.05);觀察組患者定期檢查率、規範用藥率、社會活動率分彆為90.00%、90.00%、100.00%,均明顯高于對照組患者,差異有統計學意義( P<0.05);而觀察組患者的複髮率為13.33%,明顯低于對照組患者,差異有統計學意義( P<0.05)。結論傢庭參與護理模式對顱腦損傷後癲癇患者具有十分重要的意義,較大程度上緩解患者的不良情緒,促進患者的治療依從性,降低複髮率,有利于患者的預後恢複,值得臨床應用。
목적:탐토가정삼여호리모식대로뇌손상후전간환자적예후효과。방법선취아원2012년5월지2013년6월수치적60례로뇌손상후전간환자위연구대상,분위관찰조화대조조각30례,관찰조채용가정삼여호리모식,대조조채용상규호리조시,비교량조환자적호리효과。결과호리후,관찰조환자적SAS、SDS평분분별위(25.6±4.5)분、(15.6±5.6)분,균교대조조환자출현료명현개선,조간비교차이유통계학의의( P<0.05);관찰조환자정기검사솔、규범용약솔、사회활동솔분별위90.00%、90.00%、100.00%,균명현고우대조조환자,차이유통계학의의( P<0.05);이관찰조환자적복발솔위13.33%,명현저우대조조환자,차이유통계학의의( P<0.05)。결론가정삼여호리모식대로뇌손상후전간환자구유십분중요적의의,교대정도상완해환자적불량정서,촉진환자적치료의종성,강저복발솔,유리우환자적예후회복,치득림상응용。
Objective To investigate the effect of family involvement care model in patients with epilepsy after traumatic brain in -jury.Methods Sixty cases with epilepsy after traumatic brain injury were divided into two groups , in which the family participating care model in the observation group of 30 patients and routine care measures in control group of 30 patients.Results After treatment , patients in the observation group SAS, SDS scores were (25.6 ±4.5) points, (15.6 ±5.6) points, compared with the control group patients had sig-nificantly improved with a statistically significant difference ( P<0.05 ) .In the observation group patients regularly check rates , standard-ized rates of drug use , social activity rates were 90.00%, 90.00%, 100.00%were significantly higher in patients with a statistically signifi-cant difference between the two groups , but the relapse rate was observed in patients 13.33 %, significantly lower than the control group ( P<0.05 ) .Conclusions Family involvement care model has very important significance in patients with epilepsy after traumatic brain in -jury and it is worthy of clinical application.