中国实用护理杂志
中國實用護理雜誌
중국실용호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL NURSING
2013年
22期
52-55
,共4页
卢言慧%苏颖%慕江兵%杨永信
盧言慧%囌穎%慕江兵%楊永信
로언혜%소영%모강병%양영신
健康教育%网络成瘾%家庭亲密度%家庭适应性
健康教育%網絡成癮%傢庭親密度%傢庭適應性
건강교육%망락성은%가정친밀도%가정괄응성
Health education%Internet addiction%Family cohesion%Family adaptability
目的 采用系统的健康教育对网络成瘾(LAD)患者进行干预性研究,评价系统的健康教育对网络成瘾患者的干预效果.方法 收集120例网瘾患者作为研究对象,并按照住院单双号随机分为观察组和对照组各60例.在常规治疗护理的基础上,观察组给予系统的健康教育干预,对照组给予一般的健康教育,对干预效果进行评价.结果 观察组健康教育干预前后的网瘾自测评分、家庭亲密度得分、理想适应性得分及现实适应性得分比较差异均有统计学意义；干预后,观察组网瘾评分、家庭亲密度得分、理想适应性得分及现实适应性得分与同期对照组评分比较差异亦有统计学意义；网瘾自测评分为86～90分时,进行系统健康教育对IAD有保护作用；家庭亲密度得分越高,对IAD进行系统健康教育的效果越好；理想适应性得分＞46分时,对IAD患者进行系统健康教育的效果是对照组的2倍；现实适应性得分＞46分时,对IAD患者进行系统健康教育的效果比对照组好.结论 系统的健康教育对网络成瘾的戒治有积极的作用,能很好地提高患者家庭的亲密度和适应性,改善亲子关系.
目的 採用繫統的健康教育對網絡成癮(LAD)患者進行榦預性研究,評價繫統的健康教育對網絡成癮患者的榦預效果.方法 收集120例網癮患者作為研究對象,併按照住院單雙號隨機分為觀察組和對照組各60例.在常規治療護理的基礎上,觀察組給予繫統的健康教育榦預,對照組給予一般的健康教育,對榦預效果進行評價.結果 觀察組健康教育榦預前後的網癮自測評分、傢庭親密度得分、理想適應性得分及現實適應性得分比較差異均有統計學意義；榦預後,觀察組網癮評分、傢庭親密度得分、理想適應性得分及現實適應性得分與同期對照組評分比較差異亦有統計學意義；網癮自測評分為86～90分時,進行繫統健康教育對IAD有保護作用；傢庭親密度得分越高,對IAD進行繫統健康教育的效果越好；理想適應性得分＞46分時,對IAD患者進行繫統健康教育的效果是對照組的2倍；現實適應性得分＞46分時,對IAD患者進行繫統健康教育的效果比對照組好.結論 繫統的健康教育對網絡成癮的戒治有積極的作用,能很好地提高患者傢庭的親密度和適應性,改善親子關繫.
목적 채용계통적건강교육대망락성은(LAD)환자진행간예성연구,평개계통적건강교육대망락성은환자적간예효과.방법 수집120례망은환자작위연구대상,병안조주원단쌍호수궤분위관찰조화대조조각60례.재상규치료호리적기출상,관찰조급여계통적건강교육간예,대조조급여일반적건강교육,대간예효과진행평개.결과 관찰조건강교육간예전후적망은자측평분、가정친밀도득분、이상괄응성득분급현실괄응성득분비교차이균유통계학의의；간예후,관찰조망은평분、가정친밀도득분、이상괄응성득분급현실괄응성득분여동기대조조평분비교차이역유통계학의의；망은자측평분위86～90분시,진행계통건강교육대IAD유보호작용；가정친밀도득분월고,대IAD진행계통건강교육적효과월호；이상괄응성득분＞46분시,대IAD환자진행계통건강교육적효과시대조조적2배；현실괄응성득분＞46분시,대IAD환자진행계통건강교육적효과비대조조호.결론 계통적건강교육대망락성은적계치유적겁적작용,능흔호지제고환자가정적친밀도화괄응성,개선친자관계.
Objective A intervention study was conducted with systemic health education in patients with internet addiction disorder (IAD),and evaluate the intervention effect of systemic health education.Methods 120 patients with IAD were collected,and then divided into the observation group andthe control group with 60 cases in each group.On the base of conventional treatment,the observation groupwas given systemic health education,and the control group was given general health education.The differences between the two groups were analyzed.Results The self-evaluated addiction scores,family cohesion scores,ideal adaptability scores,reality adaptability scores in the observation group before the intervention were significantly different from those after the intervention.The addiction scores,family cohesion scores,ideal adaptability scores,reality adaptability scores in the observation group were significantly different from those of the control group after the intervention.The scores of addiction ranged between 86～90,systemic health education had protection effect on IAD,the higher family cohesion scores,the better effect of IAD with systemic health education.When the ideal adaptability scores ＞46,the observation group has approximately two times the positive effect of the control group.When the reality adaptability scores ＞46,the effect of systemic health education in the observation group was better than the control group.Concl~ons Systemic health education has a positive effect on treatment of IAD,and it can improve family cohesion and family adaptability,so that the parent-kid relationship will improve.
