中国民康医学
中國民康醫學
중국민강의학
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF CHINSEE PEOPLE HEALTH
2014年
13期
25-26,32
,共3页
幸福感提升训练%抑郁症%安非他酮%疗效%生活质量
倖福感提升訓練%抑鬱癥%安非他酮%療效%生活質量
행복감제승훈련%억욱증%안비타동%료효%생활질량
Happiness increase training%Depression%Bupropion%Curative effect%Quality of life
目的:探讨幸福感提升训练合并安非他酮对抑郁症患者的疗效及生活质量的影响。方法:将符合中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准第三版(CCMD-3)抑郁症诊断标准的患者92例,随机分为两组,一组患者给予幸福感提升训练合并安非他酮治疗(研究组);另一组患者单用安非他酮治疗(对照组)。5周后,采用汉密顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评定患者的疗效,用生活质量评定量表(QOL-100)评定患者的生活质量,并于1年后统计复发率及再评生活质量。结果:5周后研究组患者的HAMD及QOL-100总评分较对照组差异显著(P<0.05),1年后研究组患者的HAMD及QOL-100总评分较对照组有非常显著差异(P<0.01)。复发率研究组患者为6.5%,对照组患者为19.6%,两组患者比较差异非常显著(P<0.01)。结论:幸福感提升训练可提高抑郁症患者的疗效及生活质量,并能降低其复发率。
目的:探討倖福感提升訓練閤併安非他酮對抑鬱癥患者的療效及生活質量的影響。方法:將符閤中國精神障礙分類與診斷標準第三版(CCMD-3)抑鬱癥診斷標準的患者92例,隨機分為兩組,一組患者給予倖福感提升訓練閤併安非他酮治療(研究組);另一組患者單用安非他酮治療(對照組)。5週後,採用漢密頓抑鬱量錶(HAMD)評定患者的療效,用生活質量評定量錶(QOL-100)評定患者的生活質量,併于1年後統計複髮率及再評生活質量。結果:5週後研究組患者的HAMD及QOL-100總評分較對照組差異顯著(P<0.05),1年後研究組患者的HAMD及QOL-100總評分較對照組有非常顯著差異(P<0.01)。複髮率研究組患者為6.5%,對照組患者為19.6%,兩組患者比較差異非常顯著(P<0.01)。結論:倖福感提升訓練可提高抑鬱癥患者的療效及生活質量,併能降低其複髮率。
목적:탐토행복감제승훈련합병안비타동대억욱증환자적료효급생활질량적영향。방법:장부합중국정신장애분류여진단표준제삼판(CCMD-3)억욱증진단표준적환자92례,수궤분위량조,일조환자급여행복감제승훈련합병안비타동치료(연구조);령일조환자단용안비타동치료(대조조)。5주후,채용한밀돈억욱량표(HAMD)평정환자적료효,용생활질량평정량표(QOL-100)평정환자적생활질량,병우1년후통계복발솔급재평생활질량。결과:5주후연구조환자적HAMD급QOL-100총평분교대조조차이현저(P<0.05),1년후연구조환자적HAMD급QOL-100총평분교대조조유비상현저차이(P<0.01)。복발솔연구조환자위6.5%,대조조환자위19.6%,량조환자비교차이비상현저(P<0.01)。결론:행복감제승훈련가제고억욱증환자적료효급생활질량,병능강저기복발솔。
Objective:Toexplore influences of happiness increase training withbupropion on curative effect and quality of life for patients with depression. Methods:92 cases with depression whowere consistentwith Chinese classification and diagnostic criteria of mental disorders-3 (CCMD-3) were randomly divided into two groups. One group was given happiness increase training with bupropi-on treatment ( study group) , while the other group was givenbupropion treatment( control group) . 5 weeks later, Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) was used to assess the efficacy, and quality of life scale (QOL-100) was used to assess quality of life. One year later, the recurrence rate was statistically analyzed and the quality of life was reevaluated. Results:5 weeks after the treatment, there were significant differences in the HAMD score and QOL-100total score between the two groups (P<0. 05). One year after the treatment, there were very significant differences in the HAMD score and QOL-100total score between the two groups (P<0. 01). The recurrence rates of study group and control group were 6. 5% and 19. 6%, respectively, and the difference was very significant (P<0. 01). Con-clusions:Thehappiness increase training can improve the efficacy and quality of life for the patients with depression, and can reduce the recurrence rate.