中国医学创新
中國醫學創新
중국의학창신
MEDICAL INNOVATION OF CHINA
2014年
19期
66-69,70
,共5页
刘小英%杨梅凤%寇海燕%刘文龙
劉小英%楊梅鳳%寇海燕%劉文龍
류소영%양매봉%구해연%류문룡
发育临界儿%早期综合干预%神经心理发育
髮育臨界兒%早期綜閤榦預%神經心理髮育
발육림계인%조기종합간예%신경심리발육
Developmental borderline child%Early systematical intervention%Neuropsychological development
目的:探究早期综合干预对发育临界儿神经心理发育的影响。方法:筛查出的总发育商为70~85分的0~6岁发育临界儿100例随机数字表法分为干预组和对照组,每组50例。对照组接受传统以体检为主的保健的基础上的常规早期教育指导,干预组在常规早期教育指导基础上,还进行了早期综合干预,采用0~6岁小儿神经心理发育检查表对两组患者分别在干预前和干预6个月后进行测查,比较两组发育临界儿干预效果。结果:干预6个月后干预组的发育商数、大运动、精细运动、适应能力、语言和社交行为的得分较对照组均有明显提高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);干预组总有效率达92%,明显高于对照组的总有效率60%,比较差异有统计学意义(字2=14.035,P<0.01)。结论:早期综合干预能提高发育临界儿的神经心理发育水平。
目的:探究早期綜閤榦預對髮育臨界兒神經心理髮育的影響。方法:篩查齣的總髮育商為70~85分的0~6歲髮育臨界兒100例隨機數字錶法分為榦預組和對照組,每組50例。對照組接受傳統以體檢為主的保健的基礎上的常規早期教育指導,榦預組在常規早期教育指導基礎上,還進行瞭早期綜閤榦預,採用0~6歲小兒神經心理髮育檢查錶對兩組患者分彆在榦預前和榦預6箇月後進行測查,比較兩組髮育臨界兒榦預效果。結果:榦預6箇月後榦預組的髮育商數、大運動、精細運動、適應能力、語言和社交行為的得分較對照組均有明顯提高,差異有統計學意義(P<0.01);榦預組總有效率達92%,明顯高于對照組的總有效率60%,比較差異有統計學意義(字2=14.035,P<0.01)。結論:早期綜閤榦預能提高髮育臨界兒的神經心理髮育水平。
목적:탐구조기종합간예대발육림계인신경심리발육적영향。방법:사사출적총발육상위70~85분적0~6세발육림계인100례수궤수자표법분위간예조화대조조,매조50례。대조조접수전통이체검위주적보건적기출상적상규조기교육지도,간예조재상규조기교육지도기출상,환진행료조기종합간예,채용0~6세소인신경심리발육검사표대량조환자분별재간예전화간예6개월후진행측사,비교량조발육림계인간예효과。결과:간예6개월후간예조적발육상수、대운동、정세운동、괄응능력、어언화사교행위적득분교대조조균유명현제고,차이유통계학의의(P<0.01);간예조총유효솔체92%,명현고우대조조적총유효솔60%,비교차이유통계학의의(자2=14.035,P<0.01)。결론:조기종합간예능제고발육림계인적신경심리발육수평。
Objective: To explore effects of early systematical intervention on neuropsychological development of developmental borderline children (DBC).Method: 100 DBC aged from 0 to 6, whose developmental quotient(DQ) were from 70 to 85, were randomly grouped. There were 50 children in intervention group and control group respectively. Children from control group accepted only routine early education guidance while children from intervention group were educated by early systematical intervention training besides routine early education guidance. Their DQ were assessed after 6 months and were compared with DQ before intervention to evaluate educational training results.Result: The scores of DQ, gross motor, fine motor, adaptation, language and social behavior of children from intervention group were higher than those of children from control group and the difference was significant (P<0.01). The interventional effective rate of the intervention group was 92%, while that of the control group was 60%, and the difference was significant (P<0.01). Conclusion:Early systematical intervention can improve neuropsychological development of developmental borderline children (DBC).