CAJ | 학술논문

文章以科学探究为研究视角，选取高中现行三个版本化学教材必修模块的习题作为研究样本，通过SEC一致性分析方法，对教材中科学探究习题与课程标准在内容分布和认知要求两个维度的一致性程度进行了对比分析。研究结果表明，教材中科学探究习题与课程标准的一致性水平有待提高，不一致主要体现在内容布局上，认知要求方面一致性相对较好。三个版本比较，A版的一致性水平最高。
문장이과학탐구위연구시각，선취고중현행삼개판본화학교재필수모괴적습제작위연구양본，통과SEC일치성분석방법，대교재중과학탐구습제여과정표준재내용분포화인지요구량개유도적일치성정도진행료대비분석。연구결과표명，교재중과학탐구습제여과정표준적일치성수평유대제고，불일치주요체현재내용포국상，인지요구방면일치성상대교호。삼개판본비교，A판적일치성수평최고。
Science inquiry is the perspective of the study. This paper selected three versions compulsory modules of chemical materials as the research samples, studied the alignment between the exercises and the curriculum standards in two dimensions of content distributions and cognitive requirements, by drawing on the U.S. SEC (Survey of the Enacted Curriculum Model). It was found that there was not a statistically significant alignment be-tween the textbooks exercises of science inquiry and the curricu-lum standards, inconsistency was mainly reflected in the content classification, and the alignment of the cognitive level was rela-tively good. Comparing the three versions, the A was the highest level in the alignment.