重庆医学
重慶醫學
중경의학
CHONGQING MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
21期
2709-2711
,共3页
邹彬%王冰%徐洁%李年琼%姚红兵
鄒彬%王冰%徐潔%李年瓊%姚紅兵
추빈%왕빙%서길%리년경%요홍병
新生儿听力筛查%高危因素%耳声发射%听性脑干反应
新生兒聽力篩查%高危因素%耳聲髮射%聽性腦榦反應
신생인은력사사%고위인소%이성발사%은성뇌간반응
neonatal screening%high risk factors%otoacoustic emissions%auditory brainstem response
目的:分析婴幼儿未通过听力筛查的高危因素和听力学特点。方法检测对象来自2009年5月至2012年2月重庆及周边地区两次听力筛查未能通过而转诊到该科进行听力学评估的3~6个月的婴幼儿,共952例。采用听性脑干反应(ABR)、畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)、鼓室声导抗和镫骨肌反射测试。结果无高危组新生儿正常鼓室图比率为74.25%,高于高危组69.61%(P<0.05);无高危组新生儿DPOAE通过率为34.57%,高于高危组27.94%(P<0.05);无高危组新生儿波V反应阈大于30 dBnHL者为55.80%,高危组新生儿波V反应阈大于30 dBnHL者为60.36%,高危组新生儿ABR听力异常率明显高于健康新生儿(P<0.05);高危组新生儿听力阈值(50.58±25.02)dBnHL高于无高危组新生儿(47.64±22.86)dBnHL(P<0.05)。结论听力损失的高危因素有新生儿窒息、早产、宫内病毒感染、高胆红素血症、体质量小于1500 g、机械通气大于或等于5d,以及大于或等于2个高危因素。
目的:分析嬰幼兒未通過聽力篩查的高危因素和聽力學特點。方法檢測對象來自2009年5月至2012年2月重慶及週邊地區兩次聽力篩查未能通過而轉診到該科進行聽力學評估的3~6箇月的嬰幼兒,共952例。採用聽性腦榦反應(ABR)、畸變產物耳聲髮射(DPOAE)、鼓室聲導抗和鐙骨肌反射測試。結果無高危組新生兒正常鼓室圖比率為74.25%,高于高危組69.61%(P<0.05);無高危組新生兒DPOAE通過率為34.57%,高于高危組27.94%(P<0.05);無高危組新生兒波V反應閾大于30 dBnHL者為55.80%,高危組新生兒波V反應閾大于30 dBnHL者為60.36%,高危組新生兒ABR聽力異常率明顯高于健康新生兒(P<0.05);高危組新生兒聽力閾值(50.58±25.02)dBnHL高于無高危組新生兒(47.64±22.86)dBnHL(P<0.05)。結論聽力損失的高危因素有新生兒窒息、早產、宮內病毒感染、高膽紅素血癥、體質量小于1500 g、機械通氣大于或等于5d,以及大于或等于2箇高危因素。
목적:분석영유인미통과은력사사적고위인소화은역학특점。방법검측대상래자2009년5월지2012년2월중경급주변지구량차은력사사미능통과이전진도해과진행은역학평고적3~6개월적영유인,공952례。채용은성뇌간반응(ABR)、기변산물이성발사(DPOAE)、고실성도항화등골기반사측시。결과무고위조신생인정상고실도비솔위74.25%,고우고위조69.61%(P<0.05);무고위조신생인DPOAE통과솔위34.57%,고우고위조27.94%(P<0.05);무고위조신생인파V반응역대우30 dBnHL자위55.80%,고위조신생인파V반응역대우30 dBnHL자위60.36%,고위조신생인ABR은력이상솔명현고우건강신생인(P<0.05);고위조신생인은력역치(50.58±25.02)dBnHL고우무고위조신생인(47.64±22.86)dBnHL(P<0.05)。결론은력손실적고위인소유신생인질식、조산、궁내병독감염、고담홍소혈증、체질량소우1500 g、궤계통기대우혹등우5d,이급대우혹등우2개고위인소。
Objective To analyze the related factors in new born failed in hearing screening and its audiological characteristics . Methods From May 2009 to Febrary 2012 ,952 infants within the 3 to 6-month-old with detailed birth records and hearing screen-ing records were reviewed in the study .They were born in Chongqing and surrounding areas ,but failed in the first and second hear-ing screening .They were tested by auditory brainstem response (ABR) ,distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) ,tympan-ometry and stapedius reflex .Results The normal ratio of tympanogram ,normal group(74 .25% ) was higher than the high-risk group(69 .61% )(P<0 .05);The pass proportion of DPOAE in normal group(34 .57% ) was higher than high-risk group(27 .94% ) (P<0 .05);In normal group ,ABR response threshold >30 dBnHL was 55 .80% ,60 .36% in high-risk group .High-risk group′s hearing abnormality rate was significantly higher than the normal group (P<0 .05);In normal group ,mean threshold of ABR was (47 .64 ± 22 .86)dBnHL .While it was(50 .58 ± 25 .02)dBnHL in high-risk group .The threshold was higher in normal group than high-risk group(P<0 .05) .Conclusion premature birth ,low birth weight(<1 500 g) ,hyperbilirubinemia ,neonatal asphyxia ,pal-ace the virus infection ,mechanical ventilation ≥ 5 days ,≥ 2 high-risk factors are risk factors for hearing loss .Newborn hearing screening is a long and arduous task ,We should enhance screening efforts in infant with high risk factors ,and actively prevent and treat neonatal perinatal risk factors and reduce the incidence of hearing loss .