世界最新医学信息文摘（电子版）
世界最新醫學信息文摘（電子版）
세계최신의학신식문적（전자판）
World Latest Medicine Information
2014年
22期
155-156
,共2页
中药肉桂%食用桂皮%比较%鉴定分析
中藥肉桂%食用桂皮%比較%鑒定分析
중약육계%식용계피%비교%감정분석
chinese cinnamon%cinnamon%comparative%analysis
目的：探讨研究中药肉桂与食用桂皮之间的比较和鉴定分析。方法将中药肉桂与食用桂皮做比较，观察其在性状、显微等方面的差异，然后将61例痛经的患者随机分为两组，对照组30例服用桂皮，观察组31例服用肉桂，观察两组的疼痛缓解情况及并发症的发生。结果中药肉桂与食用桂皮在形态、性状、显微等方面有明显差异，两组在治疗痛经的临床效果上，对照组总有效率为53.3%，观察组总有效率为83.9%，观察组明显优于对照组。结论中药肉桂与食用桂皮有较大的差异，不能混用，在临床治疗上，中药肉桂对痛经寒凝血淤证的治疗作用明显优于食用桂皮，并且并发证的发生明显低于对照组。
目的：探討研究中藥肉桂與食用桂皮之間的比較和鑒定分析。方法將中藥肉桂與食用桂皮做比較，觀察其在性狀、顯微等方麵的差異，然後將61例痛經的患者隨機分為兩組，對照組30例服用桂皮，觀察組31例服用肉桂，觀察兩組的疼痛緩解情況及併髮癥的髮生。結果中藥肉桂與食用桂皮在形態、性狀、顯微等方麵有明顯差異，兩組在治療痛經的臨床效果上，對照組總有效率為53.3%，觀察組總有效率為83.9%，觀察組明顯優于對照組。結論中藥肉桂與食用桂皮有較大的差異，不能混用，在臨床治療上，中藥肉桂對痛經寒凝血淤證的治療作用明顯優于食用桂皮，併且併髮證的髮生明顯低于對照組。
목적：탐토연구중약육계여식용계피지간적비교화감정분석。방법장중약육계여식용계피주비교，관찰기재성상、현미등방면적차이，연후장61례통경적환자수궤분위량조，대조조30례복용계피，관찰조31례복용육계，관찰량조적동통완해정황급병발증적발생。결과중약육계여식용계피재형태、성상、현미등방면유명현차이，량조재치료통경적림상효과상，대조조총유효솔위53.3%，관찰조총유효솔위83.9%，관찰조명현우우대조조。결론중약육계여식용계피유교대적차이，불능혼용，재림상치료상，중약육계대통경한응혈어증적치료작용명현우우식용계피，병차병발증적발생명현저우대조조。
Objective to explore the research of traditional chinese medicine cinnamon and comparison analysis and identification of cinnamon.Methods the traditional chinese medicine cassia and cinnamon compare, observe the morphological and histological, differences, and then were randomly divided into 61 cases of dysmenorrhea into two groups, 30 cases in the control group taking cinnamon, the observation group of 31 cases taking cinnamon, two groups were observed and pain relief and complications.Results the traditional chinese medicine cassia and cinnamon in morphology, microscopic characters, there is signiifcant difference, two groups of clinical effect in the treatment of dysmenorrhea, the control group the total effective rate was 53.3%, total effective rate of observation group was 83.9%, the observation group was better than the control group.Conclusion there is difference, chinese cinnamon and cinnamon do not mix, in clinical treatment, therapeutic effect on dysmenorrhea of congealing cold and blood stasis syndrome of cinnamon was obviously better than that of cinnamon, and after operation was signiifcantly lower than the control group.
