中国循证心血管医学杂志
中國循證心血管醫學雜誌
중국순증심혈관의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASES CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE
2014年
3期
333-335
,共3页
刘建国%许爱斌%吴龙梅%谭琛%李俊峡%崔俊玉
劉建國%許愛斌%吳龍梅%譚琛%李俊峽%崔俊玉
류건국%허애빈%오룡매%담침%리준협%최준옥
房室旁道%希氏束%射频消融
房室徬道%希氏束%射頻消融
방실방도%희씨속%사빈소융
atrioventricular accessory pathways%His bundle%radiofrequency ablation
目的:比较希氏束旁道CARTO3及常规X光指导下标测及消融方法。方法纳入12例希氏束旁道并进行射频消融治疗的患者。入选患者均进行了心内电生理检查,9例患者行常规X光透视下标测消融靶点并进行消融,3例患者应用CARTO3三维标测系统指导靶点标测及射频消融。对不同标测方法手术成功率、X线曝光时间及并发症进行比较。结果9例常规标X光测患者中成功6例(66.7%),2例未成功,1例靶点距离希氏束过近,放弃消融,术中1例患者出现一过性完全性房室传导阻滞,X线曝光时间(36.2±13.4) min;CARTO3指导3例均成功(100.0%),X线曝光时间(14.2±7.8)min。与常规X光测患者比较,CARTO3三维标测系统指导靶点消融成功率更高,X线曝光时间更短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与常规X光相比,CARTO3指导希氏束旁旁道消融可更精确指示希氏束及消融导管空间位置,缩短X光曝光时间,提高消融成功率。
目的:比較希氏束徬道CARTO3及常規X光指導下標測及消融方法。方法納入12例希氏束徬道併進行射頻消融治療的患者。入選患者均進行瞭心內電生理檢查,9例患者行常規X光透視下標測消融靶點併進行消融,3例患者應用CARTO3三維標測繫統指導靶點標測及射頻消融。對不同標測方法手術成功率、X線曝光時間及併髮癥進行比較。結果9例常規標X光測患者中成功6例(66.7%),2例未成功,1例靶點距離希氏束過近,放棄消融,術中1例患者齣現一過性完全性房室傳導阻滯,X線曝光時間(36.2±13.4) min;CARTO3指導3例均成功(100.0%),X線曝光時間(14.2±7.8)min。與常規X光測患者比較,CARTO3三維標測繫統指導靶點消融成功率更高,X線曝光時間更短,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論與常規X光相比,CARTO3指導希氏束徬徬道消融可更精確指示希氏束及消融導管空間位置,縮短X光曝光時間,提高消融成功率。
목적:비교희씨속방도CARTO3급상규X광지도하표측급소융방법。방법납입12례희씨속방도병진행사빈소융치료적환자。입선환자균진행료심내전생리검사,9례환자행상규X광투시하표측소융파점병진행소융,3례환자응용CARTO3삼유표측계통지도파점표측급사빈소융。대불동표측방법수술성공솔、X선폭광시간급병발증진행비교。결과9례상규표X광측환자중성공6례(66.7%),2례미성공,1례파점거리희씨속과근,방기소융,술중1례환자출현일과성완전성방실전도조체,X선폭광시간(36.2±13.4) min;CARTO3지도3례균성공(100.0%),X선폭광시간(14.2±7.8)min。여상규X광측환자비교,CARTO3삼유표측계통지도파점소융성공솔경고,X선폭광시간경단,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론여상규X광상비,CARTO3지도희씨속방방도소융가경정학지시희씨속급소융도관공간위치,축단X광폭광시간,제고소융성공솔。
Objective To compare mapping and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of para-His bundle atrioventricular accessory pathways guided by CARTO3 system or routine X-ray. Methods The patients (n=12) with para-His bundle atrioventricular accessory pathways treated with RFA were chosen and given intracardiac electrophysiological examinations. The target of RFA was mapped with routine X-ray in 9 patients and with CARTO3 system in 3 ones, and then all patients were given treatment of RFA. The success rate of RFA, time of X-ray exposure and complications were compared between 2 methods. Results Among 9 patients with routine X-ray mapping, 6 had successful RFA (66.7%), 2 had unsuccessful RFA and 1 abandoned RFA because of target being too near to para-His bundle atrioventricular accessory pathways. There was 1 patient had complete atrioventricular block during RFA, and the time of X-ray exposure was (36.2±13.4) min. All 3 patients with CARTO3 system mapping had successful RFA (100.0%) and the time of X-ray exposure was (14.2±7.8) min. Compared with routine X-ray mapping, CARTO3 system mapping had higher success rate and shorter time of X-ray exposure (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with routine X-ray, CARTO3 system can more accurately indicate the spatial locations of para-His bundle atrioventricular accessory pathways and ablation catheter, shorten time of X-ray exposure, and improve success rate of RFA.