组织工程与重建外科杂志
組織工程與重建外科雜誌
조직공정여중건외과잡지
JOURNAL OF TISSUE ENGINEERING AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
2014年
3期
164-167
,共4页
罗毅%严志新%汪立%陈佳佳%刘宁飞
囉毅%嚴誌新%汪立%陳佳佳%劉寧飛
라의%엄지신%왕립%진가가%류저비
继发性淋巴水肿%多频生物电阻抗分析仪%接触式水分测量仪%组织水肿%周径测量
繼髮性淋巴水腫%多頻生物電阻抗分析儀%接觸式水分測量儀%組織水腫%週徑測量
계발성림파수종%다빈생물전조항분석의%접촉식수분측량의%조직수종%주경측량
Secondary lymphedema%Multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis%MoistureMeterD Compact%Tissue edema%Circumference measurements
目的:以周径测量结果为标准,比较多频生物电阻抗分析仪与接触式水分测量仪检测继发性上肢淋巴水肿的准确性。方法随机选取在我科进行淋巴手法引流治疗乳腺癌根治术后继发性上肢淋巴水肿患者18名,以周径测量获得的上肢增粗程度为标准,将多频生物电阻抗分析仪和接触式水分测量仪对组织水肿的检测结果,与周径改变进行相关性分析。结果患肢周径变化和两种水分测量的结果均显示患者治疗后水肿程度减轻。相比接触式水分测量仪的结果(r=0.490,P<0.05),多频生物电阻抗分析仪的测试结果(r=0.579,P<0.05)与周径测量结果相关性系数更高。结论两种水分检测方法均可用于诊断上肢淋巴水肿,而多频生物电阻抗分析仪对组织水肿测量的准确性较高。
目的:以週徑測量結果為標準,比較多頻生物電阻抗分析儀與接觸式水分測量儀檢測繼髮性上肢淋巴水腫的準確性。方法隨機選取在我科進行淋巴手法引流治療乳腺癌根治術後繼髮性上肢淋巴水腫患者18名,以週徑測量穫得的上肢增粗程度為標準,將多頻生物電阻抗分析儀和接觸式水分測量儀對組織水腫的檢測結果,與週徑改變進行相關性分析。結果患肢週徑變化和兩種水分測量的結果均顯示患者治療後水腫程度減輕。相比接觸式水分測量儀的結果(r=0.490,P<0.05),多頻生物電阻抗分析儀的測試結果(r=0.579,P<0.05)與週徑測量結果相關性繫數更高。結論兩種水分檢測方法均可用于診斷上肢淋巴水腫,而多頻生物電阻抗分析儀對組織水腫測量的準確性較高。
목적:이주경측량결과위표준,비교다빈생물전조항분석의여접촉식수분측량의검측계발성상지림파수종적준학성。방법수궤선취재아과진행림파수법인류치료유선암근치술후계발성상지림파수종환자18명,이주경측량획득적상지증조정도위표준,장다빈생물전조항분석의화접촉식수분측량의대조직수종적검측결과,여주경개변진행상관성분석。결과환지주경변화화량충수분측량적결과균현시환자치료후수종정도감경。상비접촉식수분측량의적결과(r=0.490,P<0.05),다빈생물전조항분석의적측시결과(r=0.579,P<0.05)여주경측량결과상관성계수경고。결론량충수분검측방법균가용우진단상지림파수종,이다빈생물전조항분석의대조직수종측량적준학성교고。
Objective To compare the accuracy of multi -frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis and the MoistureMeterD Compact to detect tissue edema in secondary lymphedema of upper limb. Methods Eighteen patients with secondary lymphedema after radical mastectomy, treated by manual lymph drainage, were randomly selected in this study. The measurement of circumference of upper limb was determined as standard, which had an correlation analysis with multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis and MoistureMeterD Compact ’s results on tissue edema change. Results Accoring to the circumference change and the measured results of multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis and the MoistureMeterD Compact, the degree of lymphedema was decreased after treatment. The multifrequency bioelectrical impedance’s test results had an relatively higher correlation (r=0.579, P<0.05) with the results of the standard, comparing to the results of the MoistureMeterD Compact (r=0.490, P<0.05). Conclusion Both multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis and the MoistureMeterD Compact could be used for the measurement of lymphedema of upper limb, and multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis have an higher accuracy in the measurement of tissue edema.