证据科学
證據科學
증거과학
EVIDENCE SEIENCE
2014年
3期
360-372
,共13页
医疗侵权诉讼%证明责任%专家辅助人%自由裁量%证据
醫療侵權訴訟%證明責任%專傢輔助人%自由裁量%證據
의료침권소송%증명책임%전가보조인%자유재량%증거
The medical tort lawsuit%Burden of proof%Expert assessor%Judge’s discretion%Evidence
医疗侵权诉讼之证明责任分配历来是理论研究与实务操作领域关注的热点问题。虽然立法规定经历了由“谁主张，谁举证”到“举证责任倒置”，再到“附条件过错推定”阶段，立法者也试图在医患双方之证明负担之间寻求平衡。但是，鉴于医疗纠纷的复杂性，现有规定并不能满足和适应纠纷解决的需要。本文通过实证分析和比较法考察，就如何公平分配医患双方之证明责任以及医疗风险分担问题予以分析和探讨。
醫療侵權訴訟之證明責任分配歷來是理論研究與實務操作領域關註的熱點問題。雖然立法規定經歷瞭由“誰主張，誰舉證”到“舉證責任倒置”，再到“附條件過錯推定”階段，立法者也試圖在醫患雙方之證明負擔之間尋求平衡。但是，鑒于醫療糾紛的複雜性，現有規定併不能滿足和適應糾紛解決的需要。本文通過實證分析和比較法攷察，就如何公平分配醫患雙方之證明責任以及醫療風險分擔問題予以分析和探討。
의료침권소송지증명책임분배력래시이론연구여실무조작영역관주적열점문제。수연입법규정경력료유“수주장，수거증”도“거증책임도치”，재도“부조건과착추정”계단，입법자야시도재의환쌍방지증명부담지간심구평형。단시，감우의료규분적복잡성，현유규정병불능만족화괄응규분해결적수요。본문통과실증분석화비교법고찰，취여하공평분배의환쌍방지증명책임이급의료풍험분담문제여이분석화탐토。
The evidence of proof in medical tort lawsuit is always a hot topic for the theoretical research and practice ifelds. Although legislations have experienced three phases, namely from the “Who advocates, who proves” to the “Burden of proof inversion”, then the “Conditional fault presumption”, and lawmakers also have been trying to ifnd a balanced point between doctors and patients in the burden of proof. However, due to complexity of medical disputes, the current existing provisions can hardly satisfy the needs of dispute resolutions. How to distribute burden of proof and to share medical risks between doctors and patients in a justiifed way will be mainly analyzed and discussed in this article through empirical analysis and comparative research.
