青岛农业大学学报(社会科学版)
青島農業大學學報(社會科學版)
청도농업대학학보(사회과학판)
JOURNAL OF QINGDAO AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION)
2014年
3期
66-72
,共7页
土地法院%裁判所%独立审判机构%法院内设机构%路径选择
土地法院%裁判所%獨立審判機構%法院內設機構%路徑選擇
토지법원%재판소%독립심판궤구%법원내설궤구%로경선택
land court%tribunal%independent judicial organ%internal institutions in courts%approach
我国土地案件数量多,涉及利益复杂,裁判难度大,目前的法院审判机构很难有效解决相关纠纷,为此需要建立更专业的土地案件审判机构。以英国为代表的一些国家和地区建立了独立于普通法院的土地法院或裁判所,力图通过这些机构的专业化水平提高土地案件裁判质量。我国立法中没有对专业性土地审判机构作出规定,实践中部分地方法院尝试在法院直接领导下设立多种形式的土地法庭。从避免行政权力滥用、尊重司法惯例、平衡审判专业化与司法效率、减少法律规范之间冲突、节约司法资源等诸多方面考虑,效仿国外设置独立的土地法院或裁判所条件不成熟,在各级法院内部设立专业性土地案件审判机构是更符合国情的理性路径选择。
我國土地案件數量多,涉及利益複雜,裁判難度大,目前的法院審判機構很難有效解決相關糾紛,為此需要建立更專業的土地案件審判機構。以英國為代錶的一些國傢和地區建立瞭獨立于普通法院的土地法院或裁判所,力圖通過這些機構的專業化水平提高土地案件裁判質量。我國立法中沒有對專業性土地審判機構作齣規定,實踐中部分地方法院嘗試在法院直接領導下設立多種形式的土地法庭。從避免行政權力濫用、尊重司法慣例、平衡審判專業化與司法效率、減少法律規範之間遲突、節約司法資源等諸多方麵攷慮,效倣國外設置獨立的土地法院或裁判所條件不成熟,在各級法院內部設立專業性土地案件審判機構是更符閤國情的理性路徑選擇。
아국토지안건수량다,섭급이익복잡,재판난도대,목전적법원심판궤구흔난유효해결상관규분,위차수요건립경전업적토지안건심판궤구。이영국위대표적일사국가화지구건립료독립우보통법원적토지법원혹재판소,력도통과저사궤구적전업화수평제고토지안건재판질량。아국입법중몰유대전업성토지심판궤구작출규정,실천중부분지방법원상시재법원직접령도하설립다충형식적토지법정。종피면행정권력람용、존중사법관례、평형심판전업화여사법효솔、감소법률규범지간충돌、절약사법자원등제다방면고필,효방국외설치독립적토지법원혹재판소조건불성숙,재각급법원내부설립전업성토지안건심판궤구시경부합국정적이성로경선택。
There are so many land cases in China involving complicated interests that it is difficult to adjudicate them.Thus, present judicial organs in courts have severe difficulties in settling these disputes , which calls for establishing more professional forums adjudicating land controversies .Some countries and regions , represented by Britain,have set up land courts or tribunals which are independent of common courts to improve the land cases 'judicial standards .By contrast ,there does not exist any provisions related to the professional land judicial organs in China's statutes and some local courts begin to erect various land tribunals subject to the courts .It lacks fertile ground to imitate foreign countries and establish independent land courts or tribunals from the aspects of avoiding abuse of administrative power , respecting judicial customs , balancing adjudicative specialization and efficiency , reducing conflicting legal rules and saving judicial resources ,while ,it is a fairly more reasonable approach accorded to the national conditions to set up professional judicial organs specialized in land cases .