中国临床神经科学
中國臨床神經科學
중국림상신경과학
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES
2014年
4期
393-395,401
,共4页
脑膜炎%隐球菌%脑脊液细胞学%墨汁染色%乳胶凝集实验
腦膜炎%隱毬菌%腦脊液細胞學%墨汁染色%乳膠凝集實驗
뇌막염%은구균%뇌척액세포학%묵즙염색%유효응집실험
cryptococcal meningitis%cerebrospinal fluid cytology%ink staining%latex agglutination test
目的:分析隐球菌性脑膜炎脑脊液细胞学特点,比较脑脊液细胞学染色、墨汁染色、乳胶凝集实验检出隐球菌的敏感度及特异度,以提高对隐球菌性脑膜炎的认识。方法总结2008年1月至2013年2月确诊的23例隐球菌脑膜炎患者与同期住院的23例非隐球菌脑膜炎患者临床资料及脑脊液细胞学资料并予以分析。结果脑脊液细胞瑞氏吉姆萨染色检测灵敏度91.3%,明显高于墨汁染色灵敏度43.4%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);脑脊液细胞学瑞氏吉姆萨染色检测特异度100%,明显高于乳胶凝集实验法特异度56.5%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论脑脊液细胞学检查比传统的墨汁染色法及乳胶凝集实验有更高的灵敏度及特异度,且更直接,是一种先进快捷便利的检测方法。
目的:分析隱毬菌性腦膜炎腦脊液細胞學特點,比較腦脊液細胞學染色、墨汁染色、乳膠凝集實驗檢齣隱毬菌的敏感度及特異度,以提高對隱毬菌性腦膜炎的認識。方法總結2008年1月至2013年2月確診的23例隱毬菌腦膜炎患者與同期住院的23例非隱毬菌腦膜炎患者臨床資料及腦脊液細胞學資料併予以分析。結果腦脊液細胞瑞氏吉姆薩染色檢測靈敏度91.3%,明顯高于墨汁染色靈敏度43.4%,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);腦脊液細胞學瑞氏吉姆薩染色檢測特異度100%,明顯高于乳膠凝集實驗法特異度56.5%,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論腦脊液細胞學檢查比傳統的墨汁染色法及乳膠凝集實驗有更高的靈敏度及特異度,且更直接,是一種先進快捷便利的檢測方法。
목적:분석은구균성뇌막염뇌척액세포학특점,비교뇌척액세포학염색、묵즙염색、유효응집실험검출은구균적민감도급특이도,이제고대은구균성뇌막염적인식。방법총결2008년1월지2013년2월학진적23례은구균뇌막염환자여동기주원적23례비은구균뇌막염환자림상자료급뇌척액세포학자료병여이분석。결과뇌척액세포서씨길모살염색검측령민도91.3%,명현고우묵즙염색령민도43.4%,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);뇌척액세포학서씨길모살염색검측특이도100%,명현고우유효응집실험법특이도56.5%,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론뇌척액세포학검사비전통적묵즙염색법급유효응집실험유경고적령민도급특이도,차경직접,시일충선진쾌첩편리적검측방법。
Aim To analyze cryptococcal meningitis cerebrospinal fluid cytology characteristics, compared with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology, ink staining, cryptococcus latex agglutination test sensitivity and speciifcity, and improve recognization of cryptococcus meningitis. Methods During from January 2008 to February 2013, the clinical records and cerebrospinal lfuid cytological data of 23 patients with cryptococcus meningitis diagnosed in our hospital and that of 23 patients without cryptococcus meningitis in our hospital were analyzed. Results Sensitivity of cerebrospinal lfuid cytology detection was 91.3%, which was signiifcantly higher than that of ink staining detection (43.4%), there was a signiifcant statistical difference (χ2=12.0, P<0.05); Specificity of cerebrospinal fluid cytology detection was 100%, which was signiifcantly higher than that of latex agglutination test method (56.5%), there was a signiifcant statistical difference (χ2=12.79, P<0.05). Conclusion The detection rate of cerebrospinal lfuid cytology examination is more sensitive and speciifc than ink staining and latex agglutination test, which was an quick and convenient detection method.