南京师大学报（社会科学版）
南京師大學報（社會科學版）
남경사대학보（사회과학판）
JOURNAL OF NANJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY (SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION）
2014年
4期
140-147
,共8页
《中国小说史略》%“以小说见才学者”%“才学小说”
《中國小說史略》%“以小說見纔學者”%“纔學小說”
《중국소설사략》%“이소설견재학자”%“재학소설”
Zhonguo xiaoshuo shilue%showing caixue through fiction writing%caixue novels
《中国小说史略》专篇讨论《野叟曝言》、《镜花缘》、《燕山外史》及《鑘史》四部小说并名之“以小说见才学者”时，并非基于类型归纳或文体判断而言。这些小说依旧被归入“神魔小说”或才子佳人型的“世情小说”中。鲁迅此举实为强调此类小说写作者“自寓”、“寄慨”的创作倾向，突出“以小说见才学者”创作现象于小说史的叙述意义，是其建构“从无意为小说向有意为小说演进”的小说史演进规律之目的使然。这些意图及采用列举式的评判模式，导致《史略》并未妥善处理此类小说作者创作意图与作品实际书写之间的冲突，致使“以小说见才学者”最终偏向析解作者创作意图之一面。学者将“以小说见才学者”曲解为“才学小说”等，并当作重要的小说类型，进一步偏离鲁迅本意。关注古代小说演进过程中出现的“以小说见才学者”创作现象，将比拘囿于“才学小说”从概念到概念的圈定之举更有意义。
《中國小說史略》專篇討論《野叟曝言》、《鏡花緣》、《燕山外史》及《鑘史》四部小說併名之“以小說見纔學者”時，併非基于類型歸納或文體判斷而言。這些小說依舊被歸入“神魔小說”或纔子佳人型的“世情小說”中。魯迅此舉實為彊調此類小說寫作者“自寓”、“寄慨”的創作傾嚮，突齣“以小說見纔學者”創作現象于小說史的敘述意義，是其建構“從無意為小說嚮有意為小說縯進”的小說史縯進規律之目的使然。這些意圖及採用列舉式的評判模式，導緻《史略》併未妥善處理此類小說作者創作意圖與作品實際書寫之間的遲突，緻使“以小說見纔學者”最終偏嚮析解作者創作意圖之一麵。學者將“以小說見纔學者”麯解為“纔學小說”等，併噹作重要的小說類型，進一步偏離魯迅本意。關註古代小說縯進過程中齣現的“以小說見纔學者”創作現象，將比拘囿于“纔學小說”從概唸到概唸的圈定之舉更有意義。
《중국소설사략》전편토론《야수폭언》、《경화연》、《연산외사》급《뢰사》사부소설병명지“이소설견재학자”시，병비기우류형귀납혹문체판단이언。저사소설의구피귀입“신마소설”혹재자가인형적“세정소설”중。로신차거실위강조차류소설사작자“자우”、“기개”적창작경향，돌출“이소설견재학자”창작현상우소설사적서술의의，시기건구“종무의위소설향유의위소설연진”적소설사연진규률지목적사연。저사의도급채용열거식적평판모식，도치《사략》병미타선처리차류소설작자창작의도여작품실제서사지간적충돌，치사“이소설견재학자”최종편향석해작자창작의도지일면。학자장“이소설견재학자”곡해위“재학소설”등，병당작중요적소설류형，진일보편리로신본의。관주고대소설연진과정중출현적“이소설견재학자”창작현상，장비구유우“재학소설”종개념도개념적권정지거경유의의。
In his Zhonguo xiaoshuo shilue中国小说史略,Lu Xun鲁迅 devotes a special chapter to these four novels:Yesou puyan野叟曝言,Jinghua yuan镜花缘,Yanshan waishi燕山外史,and Yinshi鑘史,and identifies them as novels“showing caixue才学[academic and artistic achievements] through fiction writing”. Although this identification is not based on generic and stylistic criteria and those novels are still classified into the types of Shenmo神魔novels and Shiqing世情 novels respec-tively,what Lu Xun really wants to do here is to highlight the commonality in the creative motivation shared by their authors who manage to get their own aspirations and feelings expressed between the lines in their novels;and is to explore the significance of these novels for constructing a history of Chi-nese fiction. This is the direct result from his construction of the law governing the evolution of Chinese fiction:“novels,which were started as a by-product of literary creation,become one of the profession-al literary pursuits.”There is,however,some tension between the rationale behind and the exemplifi-cation for Lu Xun’s identification of novels“showing caixue through fiction writing”,which is inevita-bly skewed towards focusing on the novelists’ writing intentions. Researchers misunderstood Lu Xun’s concept of“showing caixue through fiction writing”merely as“caixue novels”.
