江汉学术
江漢學術
강한학술
JiangHan Academic
2014年
4期
42-51
,共10页
骆一禾%海子%诗歌主题%情爱主题%孤独主题
駱一禾%海子%詩歌主題%情愛主題%孤獨主題
락일화%해자%시가주제%정애주제%고독주제
Luo Yihe%Hai zi%poetry theme%love theme%loneliness theme
骆一禾和海子被视为一对具有共同诗歌趣味和诗歌追求的诗人,其诗歌主题也多有重合。情爱主题和孤独主题在骆一禾和海子的诗歌书写中都占有极为重要的分量,但其中体现的诗人的心灵向度却各不相同。在情爱主题上,骆一禾把情爱视为通向世界的桥梁,最终走向了宗教性的“无因之爱”;海子则把情爱视为一个封闭的天地,它在本质上是一种自我之爱。在孤独主题上,骆一禾一开始把孤独视为反思的对象,相信人不止拥有一个灵魂;海子则一直沉溺于孤独的体验中,最终走向了石头似的自我封闭。体现在情爱主题和孤独主题上的这些深刻差异反映了两位诗人深层心灵构造的不同纹理,呈现了各自鲜明而难以混同的个性。
駱一禾和海子被視為一對具有共同詩歌趣味和詩歌追求的詩人,其詩歌主題也多有重閤。情愛主題和孤獨主題在駱一禾和海子的詩歌書寫中都佔有極為重要的分量,但其中體現的詩人的心靈嚮度卻各不相同。在情愛主題上,駱一禾把情愛視為通嚮世界的橋樑,最終走嚮瞭宗教性的“無因之愛”;海子則把情愛視為一箇封閉的天地,它在本質上是一種自我之愛。在孤獨主題上,駱一禾一開始把孤獨視為反思的對象,相信人不止擁有一箇靈魂;海子則一直沉溺于孤獨的體驗中,最終走嚮瞭石頭似的自我封閉。體現在情愛主題和孤獨主題上的這些深刻差異反映瞭兩位詩人深層心靈構造的不同紋理,呈現瞭各自鮮明而難以混同的箇性。
락일화화해자피시위일대구유공동시가취미화시가추구적시인,기시가주제야다유중합。정애주제화고독주제재락일화화해자적시가서사중도점유겁위중요적분량,단기중체현적시인적심령향도각각불상동。재정애주제상,락일화파정애시위통향세계적교량,최종주향료종교성적“무인지애”;해자칙파정애시위일개봉폐적천지,타재본질상시일충자아지애。재고독주제상,락일화일개시파고독시위반사적대상,상신인불지옹유일개령혼;해자칙일직침닉우고독적체험중,최종주향료석두사적자아봉폐。체현재정애주제화고독주제상적저사심각차이반영료량위시인심층심령구조적불동문리,정현료각자선명이난이혼동적개성。
Luo Yihe and Hai zi were regarded as a couple of poets with common interest and aim to pursue ,many of their poems had the same theme.Love theme and loneliness theme were very important both in their poetry writings,but the spiritual dimensions which reflected in their poems were not the same.As for the love theme,Luo Yihe considered it as the bridge to the world,and ultimately went into the religious “uncaused love”,while Hai zi looked upon love as a closed world,it’s essentially a self-love .And as for the loneliness theme,Luo Yihe considered loneliness firstly as the object of reflection, and believed that people would have more than one soul;while Hai Zi indulged himself in a lonely expe-rience,and ultimately went into the stone-like self-enclosed.These profound differences between the two poets in the themes of love and loneliness reflected different textures deep in their structure of mind, showing their own distinctive and unconfusable personalities.