CAJ | 학술논문

近年来，“功能汽车”正呈现出向“智能汽车”逐渐进化的革命性趋势，其原因在于智能汽车对非结构化环境的高适应性。从安全监管角度来看，功能汽车的车用电子控制系统具有高度可预见性，因此功能汽车之ECU嵌入式控制单元对于环境的理解程度十分接近地面实况。然而，德国TüV安全认证机构的研究报告指出这一切将可能不再适用在智能汽车上面，特别是当驾驶辅助系统开始展现一些（半）自动行为以后。除“智能汽车”之外，无人介入的“自动驾驶汽车”亦将引发更多关于安全监管和道德伦理等问题，因此有必要以自动化伴随的“开放组织风险”为中心，来贯穿这股科技变革的起点（“智能汽车”）和终点（“自动驾驶汽车”），并分析其潜在安全隐患以及治理之道。
근년래，“공능기차”정정현출향“지능기차”축점진화적혁명성추세，기원인재우지능기차대비결구화배경적고괄응성。종안전감관각도래간，공능기차적차용전자공제계통구유고도가예견성，인차공능기차지ECU감입식공제단원대우배경적리해정도십분접근지면실황。연이，덕국TüV안전인증궤구적연구보고지출저일절장가능불재괄용재지능기차상면，특별시당가사보조계통개시전현일사（반）자동행위이후。제“지능기차”지외，무인개입적“자동가사기차”역장인발경다관우안전감관화도덕윤리등문제，인차유필요이자동화반수적“개방조직풍험”위중심，래관천저고과기변혁적기점（“지능기차”）화종점（“자동가사기차”），병분석기잠재안전은환이급치리지도。
Currently, we are witnessing the transition from feature-to smart-cars, and it will be evolutionary trend since smart-cars’ highly perception with unstructured environments. The control systems in feature cars are well understood and within our theoretical frameworks. Certain safety properties of stability control systems-for example-can be formally proved. The underlying physical models are well understood and can be iftted with accurate sensor readings. The ECUs understanding of the environment is therefore close to the ground truth. However, as pointed out in this is no longer the case for smart-cars where driver assistance systems implement (semi)-autonomous behaviors. Except to smart cars, the other unmanned autonomous robo-cars could derive more safety and ethical problems. Thus, the authors would like to analyze potential safety gaps and also to provide our suggestions for safety governance regarding the implementations of smart/robo-cars.