成都理工大学学报(社会科学版)
成都理工大學學報(社會科學版)
성도리공대학학보(사회과학판)
JOURNAL OF CHENGDU UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES)
2014年
4期
54-59
,共6页
耐用品%垄断厂商%道德风险%进入威胁%可置信承诺
耐用品%壟斷廠商%道德風險%進入威脅%可置信承諾
내용품%롱단엄상%도덕풍험%진입위협%가치신승낙
durable goods%monopoly%moral hazard%potential entrant%credible commitment
通过运用传统的两阶段博弈模型对垄断厂商出租和出售耐用品进行对比分析可知,与出售相比,垄断厂商更加偏好出租。石磊-寇宗来模型也有一定不足,需着重分析加入道德风险、进入威胁和可置信承诺的条件后,耐用品垄断厂商出租和出售耐用品的最优选择问题。研究结果说明:首先,道德风险使垄断厂商在出租耐用品时承担额外的成本,在该成本大于临界道德风险成本时,垄断厂商将选择出售;反之亦然。其次,进入威胁会促使垄断厂商选择出售耐用品以占领部分市场,阻碍潜在竞争者进入。最后,垄断厂商做出不降价的可置信承诺能提高出售耐用品时的利润,加速资金流转。
通過運用傳統的兩階段博弈模型對壟斷廠商齣租和齣售耐用品進行對比分析可知,與齣售相比,壟斷廠商更加偏好齣租。石磊-寇宗來模型也有一定不足,需著重分析加入道德風險、進入威脅和可置信承諾的條件後,耐用品壟斷廠商齣租和齣售耐用品的最優選擇問題。研究結果說明:首先,道德風險使壟斷廠商在齣租耐用品時承擔額外的成本,在該成本大于臨界道德風險成本時,壟斷廠商將選擇齣售;反之亦然。其次,進入威脅會促使壟斷廠商選擇齣售耐用品以佔領部分市場,阻礙潛在競爭者進入。最後,壟斷廠商做齣不降價的可置信承諾能提高齣售耐用品時的利潤,加速資金流轉。
통과운용전통적량계단박혁모형대롱단엄상출조화출수내용품진행대비분석가지,여출수상비,롱단엄상경가편호출조。석뢰-구종래모형야유일정불족,수착중분석가입도덕풍험、진입위협화가치신승낙적조건후,내용품롱단엄상출조화출수내용품적최우선택문제。연구결과설명:수선,도덕풍험사롱단엄상재출조내용품시승담액외적성본,재해성본대우림계도덕풍험성본시,롱단엄상장선택출수;반지역연。기차,진입위협회촉사롱단엄상선택출수내용품이점령부분시장,조애잠재경쟁자진입。최후,롱단엄상주출불강개적가치신승낙능제고출수내용품시적리윤,가속자금류전。
By using a two-stage game model,this paper analyses durable goods monopolist’s business strategy choice,and makes a reasonable explanation on the realistic question.It turns out that compared with sale,monopolist prefers to lease.But in reality,there are three factors against leasing.The first one is moral hazard,which makes monopolist bear the additional costs when leasing durable goods,and greatly reduces the enthusiasm of leasing.The second one is potential entrant that would lead to the choice to sell durable goods for monopolist,in order to capture the market share and to prevent potential competitors entering the market.The last one is credible commitment,if monopolist is able to make a credible commitment to resist cutting its prices,it can improve the profit of selling durable goods and accelerate cash flow.