佛山科学技术学院学报(自然科学版)
彿山科學技術學院學報(自然科學版)
불산과학기술학원학보(자연과학판)
JOURNAL OF FOSHAN UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE EDITION)
2014年
4期
34-36
,共3页
谢海双%林浩辉%林两楷%周荣才
謝海雙%林浩輝%林兩楷%週榮纔
사해쌍%림호휘%림량해%주영재
辅舒酮气雾剂%孟鲁司特%白三烯抗体%支气管哮喘
輔舒酮氣霧劑%孟魯司特%白三烯抗體%支氣管哮喘
보서동기무제%맹로사특%백삼희항체%지기관효천
flixotide aerosol%Montelukast%Leukotriene antibody%Bronchial Asthma
目的:探讨辅舒酮气雾剂联合孟鲁司特治疗支气管哮喘的临床疗效;方法选择60例支气管哮喘患者随机分为两组,对照组和治疗组各30例,对照组予吸氧、抗炎、扩张支气管、全身糖皮质激素等常规基础治疗,治疗组在对照组的基础上吸入辅舒酮气雾剂联合口服孟鲁司特咀嚼片治疗,14天为一个疗程,一个疗程后比较两组患者的临床疗效、肺功能变化。结果治疗组临床总有效率为90%,高于对照组总有效率66.7%,两组疗效经Ridit分析,治疗组明显优于对照组(U=2.2733,p<0.05),治疗期间两组均未出现明显不良反应。结论在常规治疗的基础上吸入辅舒酮气雾剂联合孟鲁司特治疗支气管哮喘方法疗效佳,值得在临床上广泛推广。
目的:探討輔舒酮氣霧劑聯閤孟魯司特治療支氣管哮喘的臨床療效;方法選擇60例支氣管哮喘患者隨機分為兩組,對照組和治療組各30例,對照組予吸氧、抗炎、擴張支氣管、全身糖皮質激素等常規基礎治療,治療組在對照組的基礎上吸入輔舒酮氣霧劑聯閤口服孟魯司特咀嚼片治療,14天為一箇療程,一箇療程後比較兩組患者的臨床療效、肺功能變化。結果治療組臨床總有效率為90%,高于對照組總有效率66.7%,兩組療效經Ridit分析,治療組明顯優于對照組(U=2.2733,p<0.05),治療期間兩組均未齣現明顯不良反應。結論在常規治療的基礎上吸入輔舒酮氣霧劑聯閤孟魯司特治療支氣管哮喘方法療效佳,值得在臨床上廣汎推廣。
목적:탐토보서동기무제연합맹로사특치료지기관효천적림상료효;방법선택60례지기관효천환자수궤분위량조,대조조화치료조각30례,대조조여흡양、항염、확장지기관、전신당피질격소등상규기출치료,치료조재대조조적기출상흡입보서동기무제연합구복맹로사특저작편치료,14천위일개료정,일개료정후비교량조환자적림상료효、폐공능변화。결과치료조림상총유효솔위90%,고우대조조총유효솔66.7%,량조료효경Ridit분석,치료조명현우우대조조(U=2.2733,p<0.05),치료기간량조균미출현명현불량반응。결론재상규치료적기출상흡입보서동기무제연합맹로사특치료지기관효천방법료효가,치득재림상상엄범추엄。
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of the treatment with flixotide aerosol combination montelukast for Bronchial Asthma. Methods 60 patients with Bronchial Asthma were randomly divided into 2 groups, control group & treatment group each 30 cases. Control group used conventional basic treatment, like oxygen, anti-inflammatory, bronchial expansion, and the systemic glucocorticoid treatment, and treatment group was also in the conventional way, moreover, plus the treatment of flixotide aerosol and oral montelukast chewable tablets. 14 days for a course of treatment, after a course of treatment, the two groups were compared in the efficacy and lung function changes. Results The total effective rate in the treatment group was 90%, higher than that of the control group total effectiveness 66.7%, two groups of curative effect by Ridit analysis, the treatment group was significantly better than the control group (U=2.2733, p<0.05), treatment during the two groups had no obvious adverse reaction. Conclusion It is much better to use the conventional treatment then plus the treatment of flixotide aerosol and montelukast for Bronchial Asthma, thus it is worth promoting in clinical.