CAJ | 학술논문

介绍了脱硝还原剂的选择，并以600 MW机组为例对尿素热解和水解制氨工艺从技术、经济性两方面进行了分析比较。结果表明，尿素水解工艺在设备投资上比热解工艺投资要低约11%，而且每年运行费用大约要低27%；但从工艺成熟性和运行安全考虑，尿素热解技术要比水解技术更成熟、运行更稳定和安全。研究结果对目前火电厂选择合适脱硝工艺具有一定的现实意义和参考价值。
개소료탈초환원제적선택，병이600 MW궤조위례대뇨소열해화수해제안공예종기술、경제성량방면진행료분석비교。결과표명，뇨소수해공예재설비투자상비열해공예투자요저약11%，이차매년운행비용대약요저27%；단종공예성숙성화운행안전고필，뇨소열해기술요비수해기술경성숙、운행경은정화안전。연구결과대목전화전엄선택합괄탈초공예구유일정적현실의의화삼고개치。
The selection of denitration reducing agent is described briefly, and a 600 MW unit is taken as an ex-ample to analyze and compare the ammonia production process by urea pyrolysis and hydrolysis from technology and economy angles. The results show that urea hydrolysis in equipment investment is lower about 11% than urea pyrol-ysis , and in the aspect of annual running cost is lower 27%. But taking mature technology and security of operation into consideration, urea pyrolysis is more mature in technology, more stable and secure in operation than hydroly-sis. The research results have certain practical significance and reference value for the current thermal power plant to select the appropriate denitration process.