中国临床新医学
中國臨床新醫學
중국림상신의학
CHINESE JOURNAL OF NEW CLINICAL MEDICINE
2014年
7期
611-614
,共4页
韦世壮%刘锦新%冯关荣%黄海%朱茂光%孙兴%苏泽%韦昭懿
韋世壯%劉錦新%馮關榮%黃海%硃茂光%孫興%囌澤%韋昭懿
위세장%류금신%풍관영%황해%주무광%손흥%소택%위소의
结直肠癌%腹膜转移癌%肿瘤细胞减灭术%腹腔热灌注化疗
結直腸癌%腹膜轉移癌%腫瘤細胞減滅術%腹腔熱灌註化療
결직장암%복막전이암%종류세포감멸술%복강열관주화료
Colorectal cancer%Peritoneal carcinomatosis%Cytoreductive surgery%Hyperthermic intrap-eritoneal chemotherapy
目的:探讨肿瘤细胞减灭术(CRS)加腹腔热灌注化疗(HIPEC)治疗结直肠癌腹膜转移癌( CRC PC)的疗效及安全性。方法选取结直肠癌腹膜转移癌( CRC PC)患者67例,随机分为治疗组( CRS+HIPEC)38例,对照组(CRS+静脉辅助化疗)29例,比较两组的生存期、生存率、术后并发症及化疗毒副作用。结果治疗组中位生存期23.0个月,显著长于对照组的11.0个月( P<0.01),治疗组1、2、3年生存率分别为70.9%、45.7%、8.2%,分别优于对照组的68.8%、21.2%、0%。术后并发症发生率两组相似( P>0.05)。化疗毒副作用:对照组恶心呕吐、白细胞减少、血小板减少发生率较治疗组高(P<0.01),而治疗组腹胀、腹泻发生率较对照组高( P<0.01或P<0.05);两组其他毒副作用相似( P>0.05)。结论 CRS+HIPEC治疗CRC PC能明显延长患者生存期,并发症和化疗毒副作用并没有明显增加。
目的:探討腫瘤細胞減滅術(CRS)加腹腔熱灌註化療(HIPEC)治療結直腸癌腹膜轉移癌( CRC PC)的療效及安全性。方法選取結直腸癌腹膜轉移癌( CRC PC)患者67例,隨機分為治療組( CRS+HIPEC)38例,對照組(CRS+靜脈輔助化療)29例,比較兩組的生存期、生存率、術後併髮癥及化療毒副作用。結果治療組中位生存期23.0箇月,顯著長于對照組的11.0箇月( P<0.01),治療組1、2、3年生存率分彆為70.9%、45.7%、8.2%,分彆優于對照組的68.8%、21.2%、0%。術後併髮癥髮生率兩組相似( P>0.05)。化療毒副作用:對照組噁心嘔吐、白細胞減少、血小闆減少髮生率較治療組高(P<0.01),而治療組腹脹、腹瀉髮生率較對照組高( P<0.01或P<0.05);兩組其他毒副作用相似( P>0.05)。結論 CRS+HIPEC治療CRC PC能明顯延長患者生存期,併髮癥和化療毒副作用併沒有明顯增加。
목적:탐토종류세포감멸술(CRS)가복강열관주화료(HIPEC)치료결직장암복막전이암( CRC PC)적료효급안전성。방법선취결직장암복막전이암( CRC PC)환자67례,수궤분위치료조( CRS+HIPEC)38례,대조조(CRS+정맥보조화료)29례,비교량조적생존기、생존솔、술후병발증급화료독부작용。결과치료조중위생존기23.0개월,현저장우대조조적11.0개월( P<0.01),치료조1、2、3년생존솔분별위70.9%、45.7%、8.2%,분별우우대조조적68.8%、21.2%、0%。술후병발증발생솔량조상사( P>0.05)。화료독부작용:대조조악심구토、백세포감소、혈소판감소발생솔교치료조고(P<0.01),이치료조복창、복사발생솔교대조조고( P<0.01혹P<0.05);량조기타독부작용상사( P>0.05)。결론 CRS+HIPEC치료CRC PC능명현연장환자생존기,병발증화화료독부작용병몰유명현증가。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hy-perthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy ( HIPEC) in treating patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis ( PC) from color-ectal cancer(CRC).Methods A total of 67 CRC PC were divided into two group:therapeutics group(n=38, CRS+HIPEC) and control group(n=29, CRS and systemic adjuvant chemotherapy ).Overall median survival,survival rate, adverse reaction were compared .Results Therapeutic group had a significantly better overall median survival when compared to control group (23.0 months vs.11.0 months)(P<0.01).The 1-, 2-and 3-year survival rate of therapeutic group were 70.9%,45.7%and 8.2%, respectively, superior to those of control group (68.8%,21.2%and 0%) .Two group had a similar postoperative complication rate ( P>0.05 ) .Chemotherapy toxic effects:control group had higher incidence rate in nausea and vomiting , leucopenia , thrombocytopenia ( P<0.01 ) while therapeutic group higher in abdominal distension and diarrhea ( P<0.01 or P<0.05 ) .Two group had similar incidence rate in hypoproteinemia , hepatic and renal insufficiency , respiratory tract infections , hyperbilirubinemia ( P>0.05 ) .Con-clusion The CRS+HIPEC method can greatly improve the survival of patients with PC from CRC while doesn′t sig-nificantly increase postoperative complication rate and chemotherapy toxic effects .