CAJ | 학술논문

在本文中，我检验了关于统一以来德国外交政策争论中的“正常化”这一概念的使用。在20世纪90年代初，诸如尤根·哈贝马斯等左翼知识分子倾向于批判“正常化”这一理念，转而偏好一种基于对以往纳粹时期所应承担责任的德国例外主义的形式。一种建立在“正常化”理念基础之上的外交政策首先与频繁使用军事力量相关，这一点恰恰是右翼所提倡而左翼所反对的。因此，“正常化”成为了联盟能力的同义词。然而，在20世纪90年代中期，例如埃贡·巴尔等一些社会民主党人开始使用“正常化”这一概念来指代一种建立在主权以及追求国家利益的基础之上的外交政策。在德国已经出现针对这一外交政策“正常化”的现实主义解读，并形成共识，但这并不足以捕捉到统一以来联邦共和国在外交政策领域的复杂转变。
재본문중，아검험료관우통일이래덕국외교정책쟁론중적“정상화”저일개념적사용。재20세기90년대초，제여우근·합패마사등좌익지식분자경향우비판“정상화”저일이념，전이편호일충기우대이왕납수시기소응승담책임적덕국예외주의적형식。일충건립재“정상화”이념기출지상적외교정책수선여빈번사용군사역량상관，저일점흡흡시우익소제창이좌익소반대적。인차，“정상화”성위료련맹능력적동의사。연이，재20세기90년대중기，례여애공·파이등일사사회민주당인개시사용“정상화”저일개념래지대일충건립재주권이급추구국가이익적기출지상적외교정책。재덕국이경출현침대저일외교정책“정상화”적현실주의해독，병형성공식，단저병불족이포착도통일이래련방공화국재외교정책영역적복잡전변。
In this paper I examine the use of the concept of“normality”in debates about German foreign policy since unification.In the early 1990s,left-wing intellectuals such as Jürgen Habermas tended to criticize the i-dea of“normality”in favor of a form of German exceptionalism based on responsibility for the Nazi past.A for-eign policy based on the idea of “normality”was associated above all with the greater use of military force, which the right advocated and the left opposed.Thus,“normality”became a synonym for Bündnisfhigkeit. Yet,from the mid 1990s onwards,some Social Democrats such as Egon Bahr began to use the concept of“nor-mality”to refer instead to a foreign policy based on sovereignty and the pursuit of national interests.Although a consensus has now emerged in Germany around this realist definition of foreign-policy“normality”,it is inade-quate to capture the complex shift in the foreign policy of the Federal Republic since unification.