临床麻醉学杂志
臨床痳醉學雜誌
림상마취학잡지
THE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY
2014年
7期
629-633
,共5页
缪娟娟%史宏伟%赵雅梅%王振红%葛亚力%魏海燕
繆娟娟%史宏偉%趙雅梅%王振紅%葛亞力%魏海燕
무연연%사굉위%조아매%왕진홍%갈아력%위해연
经食管超声心动图%肺动脉导管%容量反应%ROC 分析
經食管超聲心動圖%肺動脈導管%容量反應%ROC 分析
경식관초성심동도%폐동맥도관%용량반응%ROC 분석
Transoesophageal echocardiography%Pulmonary artery catheter%Volume re-sponsiveness%Receiver operating characteristic curve
目的:比较 Swan-Ganz 肺动脉导管的肺动脉阻塞压(PAOP)、CVP、右室舒张末容量(RVEDV)和经食管超声心动图(TEE)的左室舒张末面积(LVEDA)、下腔静脉内径(IVC)对容量反应的敏感性及特异性。方法选择 ASA Ⅱ或Ⅲ级的12例择期行冠状动脉搭桥的患者作为研究对象。麻醉诱导插管后置入 Swan-Ganz 肺动脉导管并放置 TEE 探头,记录切皮前(T0)、停止心肺转流后或非心肺转流下手术血管吻合完成后20 min 即快速补液前(T1)、补液后10 min(T2)和30 min (T3)的各项数据。结果与 T1时比较,T2时 PAOP、IVC、LVEDA、经左室流出道心排血量(COLVOT )明显增高(P <0.01)。T2与 T1时的差值(△值),△CVP、△PAOP、△RVEDV 与△COLVOT无明显相关性(r=-0.2985、r=-0.0918、r=-0.2436),△IVC、△LVEDA 与△COLVOT 呈正相关(r=0.4450、r =0.6120)。以15% COLVOT 的变化作为判断标准,CVP、PAOP、RVEDV、IVC 和LVEDA 的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.389(95%CI 0.035~0.743)、0.458(95%CI 0.109~0.807)、0.333(95%CI 0~0.671)、0.903(95% CI 0.701~1.000)和0.889(95% CI 0.661~1.000)。结论 PAOP、IVC、LVEDA、CO 对液体的变化较敏感,而 CVP 和 RVEDV 反应液体的变化较差,基于TEE 的 IVC 和 RVEDA 在判断 CO 增加和指导容量治疗方面更具有优势。
目的:比較 Swan-Ganz 肺動脈導管的肺動脈阻塞壓(PAOP)、CVP、右室舒張末容量(RVEDV)和經食管超聲心動圖(TEE)的左室舒張末麵積(LVEDA)、下腔靜脈內徑(IVC)對容量反應的敏感性及特異性。方法選擇 ASA Ⅱ或Ⅲ級的12例擇期行冠狀動脈搭橋的患者作為研究對象。痳醉誘導插管後置入 Swan-Ganz 肺動脈導管併放置 TEE 探頭,記錄切皮前(T0)、停止心肺轉流後或非心肺轉流下手術血管吻閤完成後20 min 即快速補液前(T1)、補液後10 min(T2)和30 min (T3)的各項數據。結果與 T1時比較,T2時 PAOP、IVC、LVEDA、經左室流齣道心排血量(COLVOT )明顯增高(P <0.01)。T2與 T1時的差值(△值),△CVP、△PAOP、△RVEDV 與△COLVOT無明顯相關性(r=-0.2985、r=-0.0918、r=-0.2436),△IVC、△LVEDA 與△COLVOT 呈正相關(r=0.4450、r =0.6120)。以15% COLVOT 的變化作為判斷標準,CVP、PAOP、RVEDV、IVC 和LVEDA 的麯線下麵積(AUC)分彆為0.389(95%CI 0.035~0.743)、0.458(95%CI 0.109~0.807)、0.333(95%CI 0~0.671)、0.903(95% CI 0.701~1.000)和0.889(95% CI 0.661~1.000)。結論 PAOP、IVC、LVEDA、CO 對液體的變化較敏感,而 CVP 和 RVEDV 反應液體的變化較差,基于TEE 的 IVC 和 RVEDA 在判斷 CO 增加和指導容量治療方麵更具有優勢。
목적:비교 Swan-Ganz 폐동맥도관적폐동맥조새압(PAOP)、CVP、우실서장말용량(RVEDV)화경식관초성심동도(TEE)적좌실서장말면적(LVEDA)、하강정맥내경(IVC)대용량반응적민감성급특이성。방법선택 ASA Ⅱ혹Ⅲ급적12례택기행관상동맥탑교적환자작위연구대상。마취유도삽관후치입 Swan-Ganz 폐동맥도관병방치 TEE 탐두,기록절피전(T0)、정지심폐전류후혹비심폐전류하수술혈관문합완성후20 min 즉쾌속보액전(T1)、보액후10 min(T2)화30 min (T3)적각항수거。결과여 T1시비교,T2시 PAOP、IVC、LVEDA、경좌실류출도심배혈량(COLVOT )명현증고(P <0.01)。T2여 T1시적차치(△치),△CVP、△PAOP、△RVEDV 여△COLVOT무명현상관성(r=-0.2985、r=-0.0918、r=-0.2436),△IVC、△LVEDA 여△COLVOT 정정상관(r=0.4450、r =0.6120)。이15% COLVOT 적변화작위판단표준,CVP、PAOP、RVEDV、IVC 화LVEDA 적곡선하면적(AUC)분별위0.389(95%CI 0.035~0.743)、0.458(95%CI 0.109~0.807)、0.333(95%CI 0~0.671)、0.903(95% CI 0.701~1.000)화0.889(95% CI 0.661~1.000)。결론 PAOP、IVC、LVEDA、CO 대액체적변화교민감,이 CVP 화 RVEDV 반응액체적변화교차,기우TEE 적 IVC 화 RVEDA 재판단 CO 증가화지도용량치료방면경구유우세。
Objective To analyze the sensitivity and specificity of several volume parameters regarding volume responsiveness.The studied volume parameters include pulmonary artery obstruc-tion pressure (PAOP),central venous pressure (CVP),right ventricular end-diastolic volume (RV-EDV)measured by Swan-Ganz pulmonary artery catheter and left ventricular end-diastolic area (LVEDA),inferior vena cava diameter (IVC)measured by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Methods Twelve patients with ASA Ⅱ or Ⅲ,scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting were studied.After anesthesia induction,the TEE probe was put into the esophagus and Swan-Ganz cathe-ter was placed in right internal jugular venous.Measurements were made at the time before cutting the skin (T0 ),20 min after divorcing from cardiopulmonary bypass or finishing vascular anastomosis in off-pump surgery(T1 ),10 min after rapid infusion (T2 )and 30 min after rapid infusion (T3 ),re-spectively.Results The values of PAOP,IVC,LVEDA,COLVOT at time T2 increased significantly compared to those at time T1 (P <0.01).No obvious correlation (r=-0.298 5、r=-0.091 8、r=-0.243 6)was observed between △CVP、△PAOP、△RVEDV and △COLVOT (the difference between T2 and T1 );Meanwhile,△IVC and △LVEDA were well correlated to △COLVOT (r= 0.445 0、r=0.612 0).Using more than 1 5% change of COLVOT after volume expansion as definition of positive re-sponse,the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of CVP,PAOP,RVEDV,IVC and LVEDA were 0.389 (95% CI 0.035-0.743 ),0.458 (95% CI 0.109-0.807 ),0.333 (95% CI 0-0.671 ), 0.903 (95% CI 0.701-1.000 ) and 0.889 (95% CI 0.661-1.000 ), respectively. Conclusion PAOP,IVC,LVEDA,CO are more sensitive to the change of volume;while CVP and RVEDV have weak responses to volume changes.This indicates that IVC and RVEDA have more ad-vantage to estimate cardiac output increase and guide volume therapy.