西部中医药
西部中醫藥
서부중의약
GANSU JOURNAL OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE
2014年
7期
128-130
,共3页
魏丽娜%刘子燕%郝晋雍%黄晓俊
魏麗娜%劉子燕%郝晉雍%黃曉俊
위려나%류자연%학진옹%황효준
小肠损伤%溃疡%非甾体抗炎药%胶囊内镜
小腸損傷%潰瘍%非甾體抗炎藥%膠囊內鏡
소장손상%궤양%비치체항염약%효낭내경
small intestine injury%ulcer%NSAID%capsule endoscope
目的:分析非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)引起小肠损伤的胶囊内镜下特点。方法:将小肠损伤患者74例根据1周前是否服用NSAIDs分为观察组与对照组,比较2组胶囊内镜下的病变部位和性质差异。结果:观察组无症状为71.4%,高于对照组25.6%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),对照组消化道出血、腹痛、腹泻均高于观察组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组胶囊内镜下检查出溃疡率为22.9%,高于对照组的15.4%,且具有统计学意义(P<0.05),对照组胶囊内镜下出血率、孤立溃疡率较观察组高,具有统计学意义(P<0.05),肠黏膜糜烂2组比较未见明显差异(P>0.05)。结论:胶囊内镜下非甾体抗炎药的损伤主要为黏膜糜烂,其溃疡表现为直径<1 cm溃疡,多发,为表浅性溃疡,较未服用药者溃疡表现有较大差别,故胶囊内镜的使用有利于鉴别及相关治疗,且检查前服用胃肠汤剂可有效减少胶囊滞留的发生,并有益于病变的检出。
目的:分析非甾體抗炎藥(NSAIDs)引起小腸損傷的膠囊內鏡下特點。方法:將小腸損傷患者74例根據1週前是否服用NSAIDs分為觀察組與對照組,比較2組膠囊內鏡下的病變部位和性質差異。結果:觀察組無癥狀為71.4%,高于對照組25.6%,差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05),對照組消化道齣血、腹痛、腹瀉均高于觀察組,差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05);觀察組膠囊內鏡下檢查齣潰瘍率為22.9%,高于對照組的15.4%,且具有統計學意義(P<0.05),對照組膠囊內鏡下齣血率、孤立潰瘍率較觀察組高,具有統計學意義(P<0.05),腸黏膜糜爛2組比較未見明顯差異(P>0.05)。結論:膠囊內鏡下非甾體抗炎藥的損傷主要為黏膜糜爛,其潰瘍錶現為直徑<1 cm潰瘍,多髮,為錶淺性潰瘍,較未服用藥者潰瘍錶現有較大差彆,故膠囊內鏡的使用有利于鑒彆及相關治療,且檢查前服用胃腸湯劑可有效減少膠囊滯留的髮生,併有益于病變的檢齣。
목적:분석비치체항염약(NSAIDs)인기소장손상적효낭내경하특점。방법:장소장손상환자74례근거1주전시부복용NSAIDs분위관찰조여대조조,비교2조효낭내경하적병변부위화성질차이。결과:관찰조무증상위71.4%,고우대조조25.6%,차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05),대조조소화도출혈、복통、복사균고우관찰조,차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05);관찰조효낭내경하검사출궤양솔위22.9%,고우대조조적15.4%,차구유통계학의의(P<0.05),대조조효낭내경하출혈솔、고립궤양솔교관찰조고,구유통계학의의(P<0.05),장점막미란2조비교미견명현차이(P>0.05)。결론:효낭내경하비치체항염약적손상주요위점막미란,기궤양표현위직경<1 cm궤양,다발,위표천성궤양,교미복용약자궤양표현유교대차별,고효낭내경적사용유리우감별급상관치료,차검사전복용위장탕제가유효감소효낭체류적발생,병유익우병변적검출。
Objective: To explore the features of non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) induced small intestine injury under capsule endoscope. Methods: Seventy-four patients were allocated to the observation group and the control group in accordance with whether they take NSAIDs one week ago, the lesions and the property of both groups were compared under capsule endoscope. Results: Asymptomatic ratio of the observation group was 71.4%, higher than 25.6% of the control group, the difference showed statistical meaning (P<0.05); the control group was higher than the observation group in the ratio of hemorrhage of digestive tract, abdominal pain, diarrhea, the difference indicated statistical meaning (P<0.05); exam ulcer rate under capsule endoscope of the observation group was 22.9%, higher than 15.4% of the control group, the difference demonstrated statistical meaning (P<0.05); the control group was higher than the observation group in bleeding rate under capsule endoscope and solitary ulcer rate, the difference presented statistical meaning (P<0.05); there was no significant difference between both groups in intestinal mucosal erosion (P>0.05). Conclusion: The injury of NSAIDs under capsule endoscope is mainly mu-cosal erosion, the ulcer is less than 1cm, multiple and superficial one, ulcer expresses significant difference com-pared with the patients who didn't take NSAIDs, which is helpful to differentiate the ulcer and the related treatment. Taking decoction before examination could effectively reduce capsule retention, and it is helpful to detect the le-sions.