放射学实践
放射學實踐
방사학실천
RADIOLOGIC PRACTICE
2014年
7期
814-817
,共4页
张澍杰%饶圣祥%陈锦%李轫晨%陈财忠%曾蒙苏
張澍傑%饒聖祥%陳錦%李軔晨%陳財忠%曾矇囌
장주걸%요골상%진금%리인신%진재충%증몽소
磁共振成像%肝硬化%对比剂%对照研究
磁共振成像%肝硬化%對比劑%對照研究
자공진성상%간경화%대비제%대조연구
Magnetic resonance imaging%Liver cirrhosis%Contrast medium%Comparative study
目的:自身对照比较Gd-EOB-DTPA 与Gd-DTPA 增强 MR 对肝硬化患者的肝动脉、门静脉和肝实质强化效果的差异。方法:回顾性分析35例肝硬化患者的Gd-EOB-DTPA与Gd-DTPA增强MR图像,计算肝总动脉、门静脉和肝实质的强化比率(PE)和肝总动脉、门静脉与肝实质的相对对比度(RC),并统计是否存在差异。结果:Gd-EOB-DTPA增强 MR肝总动脉、门静脉的平均PE明显低于Gd-DTPA(P<0.05)。Gd-EOB-DTPA 的门脉期肝实质的平均PE 明显低于Gd-DTPA(P<0.05)而动脉期肝实质的PE 值无明显差异(P=0.1010)。肝总动脉、门静脉与肝实质的 RC 值 Gd-DTPA增强 MR略高于Gd-EOB-DTPA,但是无明显统计学差异(P 分别为0.3421和0.2389)。结论:肝硬化患者 Gd-EOB-DTPA增强 MR的肝血管和肝实质效果低于Gd-DTPA,Gd-EOB-DTPA的剂量需要进一步调整。
目的:自身對照比較Gd-EOB-DTPA 與Gd-DTPA 增彊 MR 對肝硬化患者的肝動脈、門靜脈和肝實質彊化效果的差異。方法:迴顧性分析35例肝硬化患者的Gd-EOB-DTPA與Gd-DTPA增彊MR圖像,計算肝總動脈、門靜脈和肝實質的彊化比率(PE)和肝總動脈、門靜脈與肝實質的相對對比度(RC),併統計是否存在差異。結果:Gd-EOB-DTPA增彊 MR肝總動脈、門靜脈的平均PE明顯低于Gd-DTPA(P<0.05)。Gd-EOB-DTPA 的門脈期肝實質的平均PE 明顯低于Gd-DTPA(P<0.05)而動脈期肝實質的PE 值無明顯差異(P=0.1010)。肝總動脈、門靜脈與肝實質的 RC 值 Gd-DTPA增彊 MR略高于Gd-EOB-DTPA,但是無明顯統計學差異(P 分彆為0.3421和0.2389)。結論:肝硬化患者 Gd-EOB-DTPA增彊 MR的肝血管和肝實質效果低于Gd-DTPA,Gd-EOB-DTPA的劑量需要進一步調整。
목적:자신대조비교Gd-EOB-DTPA 여Gd-DTPA 증강 MR 대간경화환자적간동맥、문정맥화간실질강화효과적차이。방법:회고성분석35례간경화환자적Gd-EOB-DTPA여Gd-DTPA증강MR도상,계산간총동맥、문정맥화간실질적강화비솔(PE)화간총동맥、문정맥여간실질적상대대비도(RC),병통계시부존재차이。결과:Gd-EOB-DTPA증강 MR간총동맥、문정맥적평균PE명현저우Gd-DTPA(P<0.05)。Gd-EOB-DTPA 적문맥기간실질적평균PE 명현저우Gd-DTPA(P<0.05)이동맥기간실질적PE 치무명현차이(P=0.1010)。간총동맥、문정맥여간실질적 RC 치 Gd-DTPA증강 MR략고우Gd-EOB-DTPA,단시무명현통계학차이(P 분별위0.3421화0.2389)。결론:간경화환자 Gd-EOB-DTPA증강 MR적간혈관화간실질효과저우Gd-DTPA,Gd-EOB-DTPA적제량수요진일보조정。
Objective:To evaluate the differences of enhance effects of common hepatic artery (CHA),portal vein (PV)and hepatic parenchyma on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)MRI by using gadolinium ethoxybenzyldiethylenetri-amine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)and gadolinium diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA)separately in the same cirrhotic patient.Methods:The enhanced MR images of liver in 35 cirrhotic patients obtained by using Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA separately in the same patient were reviewed.The percentage enhancement (PE)of CHA,PV and hepatic parenchyma and the relative contrast (RC)between CHA,PV and hepatic parenchyma were calculated and analyzed statisti-cally.Results:The mean PEs of CHA,PV were significantly lower for Gd-EOB-DTPA than Gd-DPTA (P<0.05).The mean PE of hepatic parenchyma at portal phase using Gd-EOB-DTPA was markedly lower than that using Gd-DPTA (P<0.05),whereas there was no significant difference of the mean PE of hepatic parenchyma at arterial phase (P= 0.1010). The RC values of CHA,PV and hepatic parenchyma using Gd-DTPA was slightly higher than that using Gd-EOB-DTPA, yet with no significant statistic difference (P= 0.3421 and 0.2389 respectively).Conclusion:Compared with Gd-DTPA,the enhance effect of Gd-EOB-GTPA was lower in hepatic vessels and hepatic parenchyma in patients with cirrhosis,adjustment of the dosage of Gd-EOB-GTPA should be considered.