临床医学工程
臨床醫學工程
림상의학공정
CLINICAL MEDICAL ENGINEERING
2014年
8期
1033-1034
,共2页
泌尿外科%留置尿管%尿路感染%预防性护理干预%满意率
泌尿外科%留置尿管%尿路感染%預防性護理榦預%滿意率
비뇨외과%류치뇨관%뇨로감염%예방성호리간예%만의솔
Urology surgery department%Indwelling catheter%Urinary tract infections%Preventive intervention nursing%Satisfaction
目的:探讨分析泌尿外科留置尿管患者进行预防尿路感染的护理效果。方法回顾性分析108例留置尿管患者的临床资料,采用随机数字表分为观察组和对照组各54例,对照组患者在留置尿管期间进行常规基础护理,观察组患者实施预防性干预护理措施,比较两组患者尿路感染发生率、留置尿管时间及患者与家属对护理的满意率。结果观察组患者尿路感染发生率(3.7%)低于对照组患者(16.7%);观察组患者留置尿管时间(10.8±4.5)天低于对照组患者(16.5±5.4)天;观察组患者及家属对护理情况满意率(98.1%)高于对照组患者家属满意率(85.2%),差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对泌尿外科留置尿管患者实施预防性干预护理措施,可以有效降低尿路感染发生率,减少留置尿管时间,提高患者与家属对护理的满意率。
目的:探討分析泌尿外科留置尿管患者進行預防尿路感染的護理效果。方法迴顧性分析108例留置尿管患者的臨床資料,採用隨機數字錶分為觀察組和對照組各54例,對照組患者在留置尿管期間進行常規基礎護理,觀察組患者實施預防性榦預護理措施,比較兩組患者尿路感染髮生率、留置尿管時間及患者與傢屬對護理的滿意率。結果觀察組患者尿路感染髮生率(3.7%)低于對照組患者(16.7%);觀察組患者留置尿管時間(10.8±4.5)天低于對照組患者(16.5±5.4)天;觀察組患者及傢屬對護理情況滿意率(98.1%)高于對照組患者傢屬滿意率(85.2%),差異均具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論對泌尿外科留置尿管患者實施預防性榦預護理措施,可以有效降低尿路感染髮生率,減少留置尿管時間,提高患者與傢屬對護理的滿意率。
목적:탐토분석비뇨외과류치뇨관환자진행예방뇨로감염적호리효과。방법회고성분석108례류치뇨관환자적림상자료,채용수궤수자표분위관찰조화대조조각54례,대조조환자재류치뇨관기간진행상규기출호리,관찰조환자실시예방성간예호리조시,비교량조환자뇨로감염발생솔、류치뇨관시간급환자여가속대호리적만의솔。결과관찰조환자뇨로감염발생솔(3.7%)저우대조조환자(16.7%);관찰조환자류치뇨관시간(10.8±4.5)천저우대조조환자(16.5±5.4)천;관찰조환자급가속대호리정황만의솔(98.1%)고우대조조환자가속만의솔(85.2%),차이균구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론대비뇨외과류치뇨관환자실시예방성간예호리조시,가이유효강저뇨로감염발생솔,감소류치뇨관시간,제고환자여가속대호리적만의솔。
Objective To explore the nursing effect of preventing urinary tract infections in patients with indwelling catheter. Methods The clinical data of 108 patients with indwelling catheter were were randomly divided into two groups, with 54 cases in each group. Patients in the control group received routine nursing during the indwelling catheter, while patients in the observation group received preventive intervention nursing measures. The incidence of urinary tract infections, indwelling catheter time and patients' and their families' satisfaction to nursing were compared between the two groups. Results The incidence of urinary tract infections of the observation group was 3.7%, significantly lower than 16.7%of the control group;The indwelling catheter time of the observation group was (10.8±4.5) d, significantly fewer than (16.5±5.4) d of the control group;The satisfaction rate of patients and their families of the observation group was 98.1%, significantly higher than 85.2% of the control group, with statistically significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05). Conclusions For patients with indwelling catheter in urology surgery department, preventive intervention nursing measures can reduce the incidence of urinary tract infections, reduce the indwelling catheter time and improve the satisfaction rate of patients and their families.