临床医学工程
臨床醫學工程
림상의학공정
CLINICAL MEDICAL ENGINEERING
2014年
8期
1013-1014
,共2页
诊断价值%新生儿败血症%降钙素原%C反应蛋白
診斷價值%新生兒敗血癥%降鈣素原%C反應蛋白
진단개치%신생인패혈증%강개소원%C반응단백
Diagnostic value%Neonatal septicemia%Procalcitonin (PCT)%C reactive protein (CRP)
目的:探讨新生儿败血症应用血浆降钙素原(PCT)及C反应蛋白(CRP)联合检测的诊断价值。方法入选我院2011年1月至2014年1月新生儿败血症患儿80例为观察组,入选同期体检健康新生儿80例作为对照组。分别应用免疫层析法和免疫散射法检测两组的血浆降钙素原(PCT)及C反应蛋白(CRP),比较两组的PCT、CRP指标水平,比较两项检测指标的阳性预测值、特异性、灵敏度。结果观察组的C反应蛋白及降钙素原等检测指标显著高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);PCT与CRP检测指标的灵敏度、阳性预测值比较,结果无统计学意义(P>0.05);PCT与CRP的特异性比较,结果具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论血浆降钙素原及C反应蛋白为新生儿败血症的敏感检测指标,对早期诊断新生儿败血症具有重要的临床意义。
目的:探討新生兒敗血癥應用血漿降鈣素原(PCT)及C反應蛋白(CRP)聯閤檢測的診斷價值。方法入選我院2011年1月至2014年1月新生兒敗血癥患兒80例為觀察組,入選同期體檢健康新生兒80例作為對照組。分彆應用免疫層析法和免疫散射法檢測兩組的血漿降鈣素原(PCT)及C反應蛋白(CRP),比較兩組的PCT、CRP指標水平,比較兩項檢測指標的暘性預測值、特異性、靈敏度。結果觀察組的C反應蛋白及降鈣素原等檢測指標顯著高于對照組,差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05);PCT與CRP檢測指標的靈敏度、暘性預測值比較,結果無統計學意義(P>0.05);PCT與CRP的特異性比較,結果具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論血漿降鈣素原及C反應蛋白為新生兒敗血癥的敏感檢測指標,對早期診斷新生兒敗血癥具有重要的臨床意義。
목적:탐토신생인패혈증응용혈장강개소원(PCT)급C반응단백(CRP)연합검측적진단개치。방법입선아원2011년1월지2014년1월신생인패혈증환인80례위관찰조,입선동기체검건강신생인80례작위대조조。분별응용면역층석법화면역산사법검측량조적혈장강개소원(PCT)급C반응단백(CRP),비교량조적PCT、CRP지표수평,비교량항검측지표적양성예측치、특이성、령민도。결과관찰조적C반응단백급강개소원등검측지표현저고우대조조,차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05);PCT여CRP검측지표적령민도、양성예측치비교,결과무통계학의의(P>0.05);PCT여CRP적특이성비교,결과구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론혈장강개소원급C반응단백위신생인패혈증적민감검측지표,대조기진단신생인패혈증구유중요적림상의의。
Objective To explore diagnostic value of procalcitonin (PCT) and C reactive protein (CRP) for neonatal septicemia. Methods From January 2011 to January 2014, 80 cases of neonatal septicemia and 80 cases of healthy neonate in our hospital were selected as the observation group and the control group respectively. The PCT and CRP levels were detected by immunochromatographic method and immuno-scatter turbidmetry respectively, and and compared between two groups. The positive predictive value, specificity and sensitivity of PCT and CRP were compared. Results The CRP level and PCT level of observation group were significantly higher than those of control group (P<0.05). There were no statistical differences in the sensitivity, positive predictive value between CRP and PCT (P>0.05), but there was statistical difference in the specificity between CRP and PCT (P<0.05). Conclusions Both PCT and CRP are the sensitive detection indices for neonatal septicemia, and have important significance for the diagnosis of neonatal septicemia.