中国护理管理
中國護理管理
중국호리관리
CHINESE NURSING MANAGEMENT
2014年
7期
696-698,699
,共4页
急诊护士%突发公共卫生事件%应对能力%评价体系
急診護士%突髮公共衛生事件%應對能力%評價體繫
급진호사%돌발공공위생사건%응대능력%평개체계
emergency specialized nurses%public health emergency%response capacity%evaluation system
目的：分析急诊护士应对突发公共卫生事件应急能力要求，建立一套简单易行的急诊护士突发公共卫生事件应急能力评价指标体系。方法：采用自行设计的问卷咨询表，应用德尔菲法对26名护理管理、护理教育、临床护理专家进行咨询，初步构建急诊护士突发公共卫生事件应急能力评价体系。结果：专家咨询的权威系数为0.891，判断系数为0.845，熟悉程度系数为0.840，经过两轮咨询后确定的急诊护士突发公共卫生事件应急能力评价体系中，7条一级指标，19条二级指标，36条三级指标；评价体系总的内部一致性Cronbach’sα系数为0.951，重测信度为0.836，62个条目的平均CVI为0.920。结论：该评价体系具有较好的信度和效度，可作为评价急诊护士突发公共卫生事件应急能力的工具。
目的：分析急診護士應對突髮公共衛生事件應急能力要求，建立一套簡單易行的急診護士突髮公共衛生事件應急能力評價指標體繫。方法：採用自行設計的問捲咨詢錶，應用德爾菲法對26名護理管理、護理教育、臨床護理專傢進行咨詢，初步構建急診護士突髮公共衛生事件應急能力評價體繫。結果：專傢咨詢的權威繫數為0.891，判斷繫數為0.845，熟悉程度繫數為0.840，經過兩輪咨詢後確定的急診護士突髮公共衛生事件應急能力評價體繫中，7條一級指標，19條二級指標，36條三級指標；評價體繫總的內部一緻性Cronbach’sα繫數為0.951，重測信度為0.836，62箇條目的平均CVI為0.920。結論：該評價體繫具有較好的信度和效度，可作為評價急診護士突髮公共衛生事件應急能力的工具。
목적：분석급진호사응대돌발공공위생사건응급능력요구，건립일투간단역행적급진호사돌발공공위생사건응급능력평개지표체계。방법：채용자행설계적문권자순표，응용덕이비법대26명호리관리、호리교육、림상호리전가진행자순，초보구건급진호사돌발공공위생사건응급능력평개체계。결과：전가자순적권위계수위0.891，판단계수위0.845，숙실정도계수위0.840，경과량륜자순후학정적급진호사돌발공공위생사건응급능력평개체계중，7조일급지표，19조이급지표，36조삼급지표；평개체계총적내부일치성Cronbach’sα계수위0.951，중측신도위0.836，62개조목적평균CVI위0.920。결론：해평개체계구유교호적신도화효도，가작위평개급진호사돌발공공위생사건응급능력적공구。
Objective:To analyze the response capacity requirement of public health emergencies for emergency specialized nurses and to construct an evaluation system for the capacity. Methods:Two rounds of expert consultation by questionnaires were conducted among 26 emergency nursing educators, nursing administrators or clinical nurses. The ifrst, second and third class indexes of evaluation system of response capacity to public health emergency were preliminary established. Results:Evaluation system of response capacity to public health emergency for emergency specialized nurses consisted of 7 ifrst-level items, 19 second-level items and 36 third-level items. The Cr, Ca and familiarity coefifcient was 0.891, 0.840 and 0.845, respectively. The Cronbach's coefifcient, the test-retest reliability coefifcient and the content validity index (CVI) were 0.951, 0.836, and 0.920, respectively. Conclusion:The evaluation system of response capacity to public health emergency has good reliability and validity and could be utilized as a tool to evaluate response capacity to public health emergency for emergency specialized nurses.
