罕少疾病杂志
罕少疾病雜誌
한소질병잡지
JOURNAL OF RARE AND UNCOMMON DISEASES
2014年
4期
38-41,48
,共5页
温度计%测温方法%红外耳温测量计
溫度計%測溫方法%紅外耳溫測量計
온도계%측온방법%홍외이온측량계
Thermometers%Body-temperature Measurement Method%Infrared Ear Thermometer
目的：探讨红外耳温计在内儿科使用价值与细节。方法收集2012年6月-2014年6月内儿科患者220例，能采用传统水银温度计测定腋温、口腔温、直肠温的同时采用红外线耳温计测定鼓膜温度。每组根据口腔温再分为高热以及超高热组、中等热组、低热组、正常温组。结果通过对研究对象的耳温、腋温、口腔温、直肠温分析，发现4种测温结果差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。但直肠温与口温、腋温、耳温结果仍高度相关(相关系数分别为0.998,0.996和0.989)。进一步比较发现，在高热以及超高热组、中等热组、低热组、正常温组四个组别里，中等热组、低热组的耳温与口腔温度无明显相关性(相关系数分别为0.552和0.627)。结论红外耳温计可替代水银温度计在内儿科中测量体温，虽然会更安全更省时，但仍需改进。
目的：探討紅外耳溫計在內兒科使用價值與細節。方法收集2012年6月-2014年6月內兒科患者220例，能採用傳統水銀溫度計測定腋溫、口腔溫、直腸溫的同時採用紅外線耳溫計測定鼓膜溫度。每組根據口腔溫再分為高熱以及超高熱組、中等熱組、低熱組、正常溫組。結果通過對研究對象的耳溫、腋溫、口腔溫、直腸溫分析，髮現4種測溫結果差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。但直腸溫與口溫、腋溫、耳溫結果仍高度相關(相關繫數分彆為0.998,0.996和0.989)。進一步比較髮現，在高熱以及超高熱組、中等熱組、低熱組、正常溫組四箇組彆裏，中等熱組、低熱組的耳溫與口腔溫度無明顯相關性(相關繫數分彆為0.552和0.627)。結論紅外耳溫計可替代水銀溫度計在內兒科中測量體溫，雖然會更安全更省時，但仍需改進。
목적：탐토홍외이온계재내인과사용개치여세절。방법수집2012년6월-2014년6월내인과환자220례，능채용전통수은온도계측정액온、구강온、직장온적동시채용홍외선이온계측정고막온도。매조근거구강온재분위고열이급초고열조、중등열조、저열조、정상온조。결과통과대연구대상적이온、액온、구강온、직장온분석，발현4충측온결과차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。단직장온여구온、액온、이온결과잉고도상관(상관계수분별위0.998,0.996화0.989)。진일보비교발현，재고열이급초고열조、중등열조、저열조、정상온조사개조별리，중등열조、저열조적이온여구강온도무명현상관성(상관계수분별위0.552화0.627)。결론홍외이온계가체대수은온도계재내인과중측량체온，수연회경안전경성시，단잉수개진。
Objective To explore the application value and details of infrared thermometer in pediatric department of internal medicine. Methods A total of 220 patients who were admitted in our hospital from June 2012 to June 2014 were involved. The aural temperature of each child was measured using ear thermometers and the results were compared to their corresponding oral, axillary and rectal temperatures taken with conventional mercury in glass thermometer. Results The aural, oral, axillary and rectal temperatures showed significant differences (P<0.05). There was significant correlation between rectal temperatures and oral, axillary and aural temperatures(the correlation coefficients were 0.998,0.996 and 0.989, respectively). Further comparision found that there was no significant correlation between aural and oral temperatures in the group of mild or moderate fever group(the correlation coefficients were 0.552 and 0.627, respectively). Conclusion As a more efficient and secure clinical method for temperature measurement, ear thermometers can replace mercury thermometers, but it still need to be improved in further clinical pratice.
