中国民康医学
中國民康醫學
중국민강의학
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF CHINSEE PEOPLE HEALTH
2014年
14期
7-9
,共3页
单亲家庭%青少年%人格特征%应对方式
單親傢庭%青少年%人格特徵%應對方式
단친가정%청소년%인격특정%응대방식
Single-parent families%Adolescents%Personality traits%Coping styles
目的:探讨单亲家庭青少年的人格特征与应对方式的相关性。方法:采用艾森克个性问卷(幼年版)(EPQ)及应对方式问卷(CSQ)评估62例单亲家庭青少年(研究组)及62例正常对照(对照组)的人格特征及应对方式。结果:①研究组的内-外向维度评分值显著低于对照组,神经质维度评分值显著高于对照组,两组间差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05;P<0.01)。②研究组在解决问题、求助等两项因子的评分值显著低于对照组,而在自责、幻想及逃避等三项因子的评分值显著高于对照组,两组间差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。③研究组的精神质与幻想、逃避及合理化呈显著正相关(P<0.05;P<0.01);内-外向与解决问题、求助呈显著正相关(P<0.05),与逃避呈显著负相关(P<0.05);神经质与自责、幻想、逃避、合理化呈显著正相关(P<0.05;P<0.01);掩饰性与合理化呈显著正相关(P<0.05)。结论:单亲家庭青少年的人格特征可能与其采用消极的应对方式存在相关性。
目的:探討單親傢庭青少年的人格特徵與應對方式的相關性。方法:採用艾森剋箇性問捲(幼年版)(EPQ)及應對方式問捲(CSQ)評估62例單親傢庭青少年(研究組)及62例正常對照(對照組)的人格特徵及應對方式。結果:①研究組的內-外嚮維度評分值顯著低于對照組,神經質維度評分值顯著高于對照組,兩組間差異均具有統計學意義(P<0.05;P<0.01)。②研究組在解決問題、求助等兩項因子的評分值顯著低于對照組,而在自責、幻想及逃避等三項因子的評分值顯著高于對照組,兩組間差異均具有統計學意義(P<0.01)。③研究組的精神質與幻想、逃避及閤理化呈顯著正相關(P<0.05;P<0.01);內-外嚮與解決問題、求助呈顯著正相關(P<0.05),與逃避呈顯著負相關(P<0.05);神經質與自責、幻想、逃避、閤理化呈顯著正相關(P<0.05;P<0.01);掩飾性與閤理化呈顯著正相關(P<0.05)。結論:單親傢庭青少年的人格特徵可能與其採用消極的應對方式存在相關性。
목적:탐토단친가정청소년적인격특정여응대방식적상관성。방법:채용애삼극개성문권(유년판)(EPQ)급응대방식문권(CSQ)평고62례단친가정청소년(연구조)급62례정상대조(대조조)적인격특정급응대방식。결과:①연구조적내-외향유도평분치현저저우대조조,신경질유도평분치현저고우대조조,량조간차이균구유통계학의의(P<0.05;P<0.01)。②연구조재해결문제、구조등량항인자적평분치현저저우대조조,이재자책、환상급도피등삼항인자적평분치현저고우대조조,량조간차이균구유통계학의의(P<0.01)。③연구조적정신질여환상、도피급합이화정현저정상관(P<0.05;P<0.01);내-외향여해결문제、구조정현저정상관(P<0.05),여도피정현저부상관(P<0.05);신경질여자책、환상、도피、합이화정현저정상관(P<0.05;P<0.01);엄식성여합이화정현저정상관(P<0.05)。결론:단친가정청소년적인격특정가능여기채용소겁적응대방식존재상관성。
Objective:To explore correlations among personality traits and coping styles of adolescents in single-parent fami-lies. Methods:62 adolescents in the single-parent families (study group) and 62 normal controls (control group) were assessed with the Eysenck personality (junior) questionnaire (EPQ) and coping style questionnaire (CSQ). Results: (1) Study group showed sig-nificantly lower score of introversion-extraversion in EPQ than that in control group, but higher neuroticism score, and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0. 05; P<0. 01). (2) Compared with those of control group, problem-sol-ving, resort scales in CSQ were significantly lower in study group (P<0. 01), while scales of self-blame, illusion and avoidance in study control group were significantly higher; and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0. 01). (3) The psychoticism scales in study group were positively correlated with illusion scales, avoidance scales and rationalization scales (P<0. 05; P<0. 01); the extraversion scales were positively related with problem-solving scales and resort scales (P<0. 05), and negatively correlated with avoidance scales (P<0. 05); the neuroticism scales were positively related with self-blame scales, illusion scales, a-voidance scales and rationalization scales (P<0. 05; P<0. 01); The lie scales were positively correlated with rationalization scales in study group (P<0. 05). Conclusions: The personalty traits of adolescents in the single-parent families may be related to their negative coping styles.