中国临床保健杂志
中國臨床保健雜誌
중국림상보건잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HEALTHCARE
2014年
4期
362-364
,共3页
曹莉%袁良津%陈祚胜%施雪英%谢丹丹%王雷%江伟%刘玉玲
曹莉%袁良津%陳祚勝%施雪英%謝丹丹%王雷%江偉%劉玉玲
조리%원량진%진조성%시설영%사단단%왕뢰%강위%류옥령
脑梗死%经颅磁刺激%功能恢复%运动活动
腦梗死%經顱磁刺激%功能恢複%運動活動
뇌경사%경로자자격%공능회복%운동활동
Brain Infarction%Transcranial magnetic stimulation%Recovery of function%Motor activity
目的:观察重复经颅磁刺激( rTMS)对脑梗死患者运动功能恢复的影响。方法共选取60例脑梗死偏瘫的患者,随机分为低频刺激组,高频刺激组,对照组,每组20例。患者均接受脑梗死常规治疗,低频组和高频组在常规治疗基础上予以每天30 min的rTMS治疗,疗程10 d。比较治疗前后患者的运动功能,采用简式Fugl-Meyer评分(FMA)评定,同时检测各组脑梗死患侧运动诱发电位(MEP)潜伏期、波幅。结果治疗后,三组FMA评分均有明显的提高(P<0.05),低频组及高频组FMA评分明显高于对照组(P<0.05),低频刺激组和高频刺激组相比,FMA评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但低频刺激组MEP潜伏期较高频刺激组缩短(P<0.05)、波幅峰值高于高频刺激组(P<0.05)。结论低频及高频刺激均有利于脑梗死患者运动功能的康复。
目的:觀察重複經顱磁刺激( rTMS)對腦梗死患者運動功能恢複的影響。方法共選取60例腦梗死偏癱的患者,隨機分為低頻刺激組,高頻刺激組,對照組,每組20例。患者均接受腦梗死常規治療,低頻組和高頻組在常規治療基礎上予以每天30 min的rTMS治療,療程10 d。比較治療前後患者的運動功能,採用簡式Fugl-Meyer評分(FMA)評定,同時檢測各組腦梗死患側運動誘髮電位(MEP)潛伏期、波幅。結果治療後,三組FMA評分均有明顯的提高(P<0.05),低頻組及高頻組FMA評分明顯高于對照組(P<0.05),低頻刺激組和高頻刺激組相比,FMA評分差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),但低頻刺激組MEP潛伏期較高頻刺激組縮短(P<0.05)、波幅峰值高于高頻刺激組(P<0.05)。結論低頻及高頻刺激均有利于腦梗死患者運動功能的康複。
목적:관찰중복경로자자격( rTMS)대뇌경사환자운동공능회복적영향。방법공선취60례뇌경사편탄적환자,수궤분위저빈자격조,고빈자격조,대조조,매조20례。환자균접수뇌경사상규치료,저빈조화고빈조재상규치료기출상여이매천30 min적rTMS치료,료정10 d。비교치료전후환자적운동공능,채용간식Fugl-Meyer평분(FMA)평정,동시검측각조뇌경사환측운동유발전위(MEP)잠복기、파폭。결과치료후,삼조FMA평분균유명현적제고(P<0.05),저빈조급고빈조FMA평분명현고우대조조(P<0.05),저빈자격조화고빈자격조상비,FMA평분차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),단저빈자격조MEP잠복기교고빈자격조축단(P<0.05)、파폭봉치고우고빈자격조(P<0.05)。결론저빈급고빈자격균유리우뇌경사환자운동공능적강복。
Objective To observe repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation ( rTMS) for the recovery of motor dysfunction in patients with cerebral infarction .Methods Sixty cerebral infraction patients with hemiplegia were enrolled and randomly divided into low-frequency stimulation group ,high-frequency stimulation group and control group with twenty cases in each group .All patients received conventional treatment for cerebral infarction .Both low and high-frequency groups also received thirty minutes of daily rTMS treatment for ten consecutive days .Simplified Fugl-Meyer score (FMA) and latency and amplitude of motor evoked potential (MEP) were compared before and af-ter treatment.Results After treatment,FMA score among 3 groups significantly improved(P<0.05),higher in both low and high-frequency groups compared with the control group (P<0.05),although the score had no significant difference in both low and high-frequency groups(P>0.05),MEP latency was shorter(P<0.05) and amplitude higher(P<0.05) in the low-frequency group than the high-frequency group.Conclusion Low and high-frequency stimulation is beneficial for the recovery of motor function in patients with cerebral infarction .