临床精神医学杂志
臨床精神醫學雜誌
림상정신의학잡지
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
2014年
4期
227-229
,共3页
李洁%李娟%Jheanell Gabbidon%Sarah Clement%马志莹%郭扬波%Graham Thornicroft
李潔%李娟%Jheanell Gabbidon%Sarah Clement%馬誌瑩%郭颺波%Graham Thornicroft
리길%리연%Jheanell Gabbidon%Sarah Clement%마지형%곽양파%Graham Thornicroft
精神疾病%社区精神卫生工作者%病耻感%心理测量
精神疾病%社區精神衛生工作者%病恥感%心理測量
정신질병%사구정신위생공작자%병치감%심리측량
mental illness%community mental health staff%stigma%psychometric assessment
目的:探讨临床医生精神疾病态度量表(MICA)中文版在社区精神卫生工作者中的信度、效度与可接受性。方法:应用 MICA 中文版对广州市8个区(市)80名社区精神卫生工作者进行间隔1周的两次调查、报告和意向行为量表(RIBS)调查,并附加关于生活中对精神疾病患者态度及对 MICA 理解度的调查。结果:MICA 中文版内部一致性信度(Cronbach’α)为0.720,分半信度为0.685,重测信度为0.764(P ﹤0.05);表面效度良好;与 RIBS 总分及附加条目评分呈负相关(r =-0.516,r =-0.310;P 均﹤0.01)。主成份分析产生6个因子,共解释方差65.1±。该量表3 min 内可完成。结论:MICA中文版是社区精神卫生工作者对精神疾病态度的有效评估工具。
目的:探討臨床醫生精神疾病態度量錶(MICA)中文版在社區精神衛生工作者中的信度、效度與可接受性。方法:應用 MICA 中文版對廣州市8箇區(市)80名社區精神衛生工作者進行間隔1週的兩次調查、報告和意嚮行為量錶(RIBS)調查,併附加關于生活中對精神疾病患者態度及對 MICA 理解度的調查。結果:MICA 中文版內部一緻性信度(Cronbach’α)為0.720,分半信度為0.685,重測信度為0.764(P ﹤0.05);錶麵效度良好;與 RIBS 總分及附加條目評分呈負相關(r =-0.516,r =-0.310;P 均﹤0.01)。主成份分析產生6箇因子,共解釋方差65.1±。該量錶3 min 內可完成。結論:MICA中文版是社區精神衛生工作者對精神疾病態度的有效評估工具。
목적:탐토림상의생정신질병태도량표(MICA)중문판재사구정신위생공작자중적신도、효도여가접수성。방법:응용 MICA 중문판대엄주시8개구(시)80명사구정신위생공작자진행간격1주적량차조사、보고화의향행위량표(RIBS)조사,병부가관우생활중대정신질병환자태도급대 MICA 리해도적조사。결과:MICA 중문판내부일치성신도(Cronbach’α)위0.720,분반신도위0.685,중측신도위0.764(P ﹤0.05);표면효도량호;여 RIBS 총분급부가조목평분정부상관(r =-0.516,r =-0.310;P 균﹤0.01)。주성빈분석산생6개인자,공해석방차65.1±。해량표3 min 내가완성。결론:MICA중문판시사구정신위생공작자대정신질병태도적유효평고공구。
To study the reliability,validity and acceptability of the mental illness:clinicians′attitudes scale(MICA)Chinese vision among community mental health staff. Method:Eighty community mental health staff from 8 regions in Guangzhou were investigated by MICA Chinese vision twice one week a-part;and also by reports and intent behavior scale(RIBS),additinal item attitude toward patients with mental illness in live life and the understanding degree of the MICA. Results:The internal consistency(Cronbach’α)of MICA Chinese vision was 0. 720 and the Spearman-Brown split-half correlation was 0. 685. The test-retest reliability was 0. 764(P ﹤ 0. 05). The scale had good face validity. Its nagetive correlation with RIBS score and the additional item(r = - 0. 516,r = - 0. 310;all P ﹤ 0. 01). Principal component analysis produced 6 factors and could explain 65. 1± variance. The scale can be completed in 3 min. Conclusion:MICA Chinese version is an effective assessment tools on community mental health worker attitudes toward mental illness.