CAJ | 학술논문

目的：对自然妊娠和促排卵技术妊娠双胎的母婴围生期预后进行探讨。方法回顾性分析本院妇产科随访的143例产妇，其中促排卵组65例，自然妊娠组78例，比较两组母婴围生期预后情况。结果自然妊娠组和促排卵组在产妇并发症发生方面比较无显著差异（P＞0.05），同时两组在新生儿并发症方面无显著差异（P＞0.05）。结论促排卵组和自然分娩组母婴围生期预后无显著差异，因此促排卵技术妊娠双胎是安全的。
목적：대자연임신화촉배란기술임신쌍태적모영위생기예후진행탐토。방법회고성분석본원부산과수방적143례산부，기중촉배란조65례，자연임신조78례，비교량조모영위생기예후정황。결과자연임신조화촉배란조재산부병발증발생방면비교무현저차이（P＞0.05），동시량조재신생인병발증방면무현저차이（P＞0.05）。결론촉배란조화자연분면조모영위생기예후무현저차이，인차촉배란기술임신쌍태시안전적。
Objective To explore the perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies among cases of natural conception and ovulation induction. Method A follow-up of third-grade class our hospital obstetrics and gynecology were retrospectively analyzed 143 cases of maternal, which ovulation induction group 65 examples, the natural conception group 78 examples, to compare two groups of perinatal outcomes. Result Natural conception group and ovulation induction group had no significant differences in maternal complications (P>0.05), at the same time two groups had no signiifcant differences in infant complications (P > 0.05). Conclusion Ovulation induction and natural conception group no significant differences in perinatal outcomes, thus ovulation induction technology to fertility twins is safe.