中国康复理论与实践
中國康複理論與實踐
중국강복이론여실천
CHINESE JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION THEORY & PRACTICE
2014年
8期
785-788
,共4页
恶性肿瘤%儿童%家长%家庭任务干预%自我效能感%家庭功能
噁性腫瘤%兒童%傢長%傢庭任務榦預%自我效能感%傢庭功能
악성종류%인동%가장%가정임무간예%자아효능감%가정공능
malignant tumor%children%parents%family mission intervention%self-efficacy%family function
目的：探讨家庭任务干预对恶性肿瘤患儿家庭功能及父母自我效能感的效果。方法选取2012年8~12月在唐山市4家三级综合性医院内就诊的白血病等恶性肿瘤患儿的母亲或父亲58名为研究对象，分为对照组(n=28)和干预组(n=30)，两组患儿均进行常规治疗和护理，干预组同时进行家庭任务干预，时间为1个月。在干预前后分别采用家庭功能量表(FFFS)和家长自我效能量表(SEPTI)进行评测。结果干预后，干预组的FFFS总均分(1.01±0.55)、家庭与个体的关系(0.79±0.64)、家庭与社会的关系(1.21±0.92)得分均低于对照组(P<0.05)；干预组父母在SEPTI约束/限制(4.19±0.55)、游戏(4.09±0.32)和教育(4.17±0.78)方面的得分均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论家庭任务干预能改善恶性肿瘤患儿的家庭功能，提高患儿父母的自我效能感。
目的：探討傢庭任務榦預對噁性腫瘤患兒傢庭功能及父母自我效能感的效果。方法選取2012年8~12月在唐山市4傢三級綜閤性醫院內就診的白血病等噁性腫瘤患兒的母親或父親58名為研究對象，分為對照組(n=28)和榦預組(n=30)，兩組患兒均進行常規治療和護理，榦預組同時進行傢庭任務榦預，時間為1箇月。在榦預前後分彆採用傢庭功能量錶(FFFS)和傢長自我效能量錶(SEPTI)進行評測。結果榦預後，榦預組的FFFS總均分(1.01±0.55)、傢庭與箇體的關繫(0.79±0.64)、傢庭與社會的關繫(1.21±0.92)得分均低于對照組(P<0.05)；榦預組父母在SEPTI約束/限製(4.19±0.55)、遊戲(4.09±0.32)和教育(4.17±0.78)方麵的得分均高于對照組(P<0.05)。結論傢庭任務榦預能改善噁性腫瘤患兒的傢庭功能，提高患兒父母的自我效能感。
목적：탐토가정임무간예대악성종류환인가정공능급부모자아효능감적효과。방법선취2012년8~12월재당산시4가삼급종합성의원내취진적백혈병등악성종류환인적모친혹부친58명위연구대상，분위대조조(n=28)화간예조(n=30)，량조환인균진행상규치료화호리，간예조동시진행가정임무간예，시간위1개월。재간예전후분별채용가정공능량표(FFFS)화가장자아효능량표(SEPTI)진행평측。결과간예후，간예조적FFFS총균분(1.01±0.55)、가정여개체적관계(0.79±0.64)、가정여사회적관계(1.21±0.92)득분균저우대조조(P<0.05)；간예조부모재SEPTI약속/한제(4.19±0.55)、유희(4.09±0.32)화교육(4.17±0.78)방면적득분균고우대조조(P<0.05)。결론가정임무간예능개선악성종류환인적가정공능，제고환인부모적자아효능감。
Objective To explore the effect of family mission intervention on family function and parental self-efficacy in children with malignant tumor. Methods 58 children with malignant tumor from 4 tertiary general hospitals in Tangshan city were included. Their parents were divided into control group (n=28) and intervention group (n=30). Both groups received routine treatment and nursing, while the inter-vention group received family mission intervention in addition. They were evaluated with Feetham Family Functioning Survey (FFFS) and the Self-Efficacy for Parenting Tasks Index-Toddler Scale (SEPTI) before and after intervention. Results After intervention, the total FFFS score (1.01±0.55), family and individual relationship score (0.79±0.64), and family and social relations score (1.21±0.92) were lower in the intervention group than in the control group (P<0.05). The scores of limit/constraint (4.19 ± 0.55), game (4.09 ± 0.32), and education (4.17 ± 0.78) of SEPTI were higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Family mission intervention can im-prove the family function of children with malignant tumor, and improve the parents' self-efficacy.
