现代肿瘤医学
現代腫瘤醫學
현대종류의학
JOURNAL OF MODERN ONCOLOGY
2014年
8期
1856-1858
,共3页
王轶楠%肖建波%赵郁%岳海淑%李海丽
王軼楠%肖建波%趙鬱%嶽海淑%李海麗
왕질남%초건파%조욱%악해숙%리해려
局部晚期非小细胞肺癌%放化同期治疗(CRT)%放化序贯治疗%MGMT 基因%甲基化
跼部晚期非小細胞肺癌%放化同期治療(CRT)%放化序貫治療%MGMT 基因%甲基化
국부만기비소세포폐암%방화동기치료(CRT)%방화서관치료%MGMT 기인%갑기화
local advanced non - small cell lung cancer%concurrent chemoradiotherapy(CRT)%sequential therapy%MGMT gene%methylation
目的:比较放化同期治疗和放化序贯治疗对局部晚期非小细胞肺癌血浆中 MGMT 的影响。方法:2010年1月至2012年12月,64例经病理确诊的Ⅱb 至Ⅲb 期非小细胞肺癌患者,随机分成放化同期治疗(A组)和放化序贯治疗(B 组)两组。A 组采用三维适形放疗及同期每周 TC 方案化疗后序贯 TC 方案化疗2个周期。B 组先接受三维适形放疗后序贯 TC 方案化疗4个周期。在放射治疗前、放疗开始一个月和治疗后(两组均完成四个周期化疗后)采用巢式甲基化特异性 PCR 方法检测 MGMT 基因的甲基化状态。比较两组 MGMT 基因甲基化阳性率的动态变化情况。结果:A、B 两组缓解率分别为90.6%和68.8%;A 组近期治疗有效率明显优于 B 组( P =0.0296)。A 组和 B 组的中位疾病进展时间为8.8个月(3-22个月)和7.3个月(2.8-21个月)(P =0.4635)。A、B 两组1年生存率分别为74.1%、72.4%;2年生存率为46.8%、45.2%(P ﹥0.05)。在放射治疗前,A 组和 B 组的 MGMT 基因甲基化阳性率分别为31.3%(10/32)和34.4%(11/32),无显著性差异(P =0.7901);放疗开始1个月甲基化阳性率分别为15.6%(5/32)和37.5%(12/32),有显著性差异(P =0.0476);治疗后甲基化阳性率分别为9.4%(3/32)和21.9%(7/32),无显著性差异(P =0.1685)。治疗前后,A 组 MGMT 基因甲基化阳性率显著下降(P =0.0296);B 组有下降趋势但无显著差异。结论:放化同期治疗较序贯治疗能够有效降低局部晚期肺癌血浆中 MGMT 基因异常甲基化,提示同期化疗能够抑制肿瘤放疗过程中放疗诱发的肿瘤再修复。
目的:比較放化同期治療和放化序貫治療對跼部晚期非小細胞肺癌血漿中 MGMT 的影響。方法:2010年1月至2012年12月,64例經病理確診的Ⅱb 至Ⅲb 期非小細胞肺癌患者,隨機分成放化同期治療(A組)和放化序貫治療(B 組)兩組。A 組採用三維適形放療及同期每週 TC 方案化療後序貫 TC 方案化療2箇週期。B 組先接受三維適形放療後序貫 TC 方案化療4箇週期。在放射治療前、放療開始一箇月和治療後(兩組均完成四箇週期化療後)採用巢式甲基化特異性 PCR 方法檢測 MGMT 基因的甲基化狀態。比較兩組 MGMT 基因甲基化暘性率的動態變化情況。結果:A、B 兩組緩解率分彆為90.6%和68.8%;A 組近期治療有效率明顯優于 B 組( P =0.0296)。A 組和 B 組的中位疾病進展時間為8.8箇月(3-22箇月)和7.3箇月(2.8-21箇月)(P =0.4635)。A、B 兩組1年生存率分彆為74.1%、72.4%;2年生存率為46.8%、45.2%(P ﹥0.05)。在放射治療前,A 組和 B 組的 MGMT 基因甲基化暘性率分彆為31.3%(10/32)和34.4%(11/32),無顯著性差異(P =0.7901);放療開始1箇月甲基化暘性率分彆為15.6%(5/32)和37.5%(12/32),有顯著性差異(P =0.0476);治療後甲基化暘性率分彆為9.4%(3/32)和21.9%(7/32),無顯著性差異(P =0.1685)。治療前後,A 組 MGMT 基因甲基化暘性率顯著下降(P =0.0296);B 組有下降趨勢但無顯著差異。結論:放化同期治療較序貫治療能夠有效降低跼部晚期肺癌血漿中 MGMT 基因異常甲基化,提示同期化療能夠抑製腫瘤放療過程中放療誘髮的腫瘤再脩複。
목적:비교방화동기치료화방화서관치료대국부만기비소세포폐암혈장중 MGMT 적영향。방법:2010년1월지2012년12월,64례경병리학진적Ⅱb 지Ⅲb 기비소세포폐암환자,수궤분성방화동기치료(A조)화방화서관치료(B 조)량조。A 조채용삼유괄형방료급동기매주 TC 방안화료후서관 TC 방안화료2개주기。B 조선접수삼유괄형방료후서관 TC 방안화료4개주기。재방사치료전、방료개시일개월화치료후(량조균완성사개주기화료후)채용소식갑기화특이성 PCR 방법검측 MGMT 기인적갑기화상태。비교량조 MGMT 기인갑기화양성솔적동태변화정황。결과:A、B 량조완해솔분별위90.6%화68.8%;A 조근기치료유효솔명현우우 B 조( P =0.0296)。A 조화 B 조적중위질병진전시간위8.8개월(3-22개월)화7.3개월(2.8-21개월)(P =0.4635)。A、B 량조1년생존솔분별위74.1%、72.4%;2년생존솔위46.8%、45.2%(P ﹥0.05)。재방사치료전,A 조화 B 조적 MGMT 기인갑기화양성솔분별위31.3%(10/32)화34.4%(11/32),무현저성차이(P =0.7901);방료개시1개월갑기화양성솔분별위15.6%(5/32)화37.5%(12/32),유현저성차이(P =0.0476);치료후갑기화양성솔분별위9.4%(3/32)화21.9%(7/32),무현저성차이(P =0.1685)。치료전후,A 조 MGMT 기인갑기화양성솔현저하강(P =0.0296);B 조유하강추세단무현저차이。결론:방화동기치료교서관치료능구유효강저국부만기폐암혈장중 MGMT 기인이상갑기화,제시동기화료능구억제종류방료과정중방료유발적종류재수복。
To compare effect of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and sequential therapy on plasma MG-MT in local advanced non small cell lung cancer(NSCLC). Methods:From 2010 January to 2012 December,64 Ⅱb and Ⅲb stage patients with pathologically confirmed non small cell lung cancer,were divided randomly into concurrent chemoradiotherapy group(group A)and sequential therapy group(group B). Group A was treated with three - dimen-sional conformal radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy with weekly TC,then sequential TC 2 cycles. Group B re-ceived 4 cycles'TC regimen chemotherapy after three - dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Nested methylation specif-ic PCR(nMSP)was used to detect plasma MGMT methylation of patients from preradiotherapy,radiotherapy in one month to post - treatment. Compare the dynamic changes of the MGMT methylation positive rate. Results:The remis-sion rates in groups A,B were 90. 6% and 68. 8% ,the effective rate of treatmen in group A was better than that of B (P = 0. 0296). The median TTP was 8. 8 months(3 - 22 months)in group A and 7. 3months(2. 8 - 21 months)in group B(P = 0. 4635). 1 - year overall survival rates were 74. 1% ,72. 4% respectively in group A and B,2 - year o-verall survival rates were 46. 8% ,45. 2%(P ﹥ 0. 05). The MGMT methylation positive rates of A group and B were 31. 3%(10 / 32)and 34. 4%(11 / 32),no significant difference(P = 0. 7901)before radiotherapy;were 15. 6%(5 /32)and 37. 5%(12 / 32)radiotherapy in one month,significant difference( P = 0 . 0476 )and after treatment was 9. 4%(3 / 32)and 21. 9%(7 / 32),no significant difference(P = 0. 1685). Before and after the treatment,the MGMT methylation positive rates in group A decreased significantly(P = 0. 0296). Group B had no significant difference ex-cept the decline trend. Conclusion:Concurrent chemoradiotherapy was more effective than the sequential therapy in reducing plasma MGMT methylation of locally advanced NSCLC. Concurrent chemotherapy can inhibit the radiation -induced repair of DNA damage in patients in the process of tumor radiotherapy.