CAJ | 학술논문

《科学引文索引》（science citation index ，SCI）作为客观公正的国际文献索引目前被作为评价科研水平的指标使用，其正向作用是主要的，但其自身的局限性并且人为错误地应用于评价不同职业和领域的科研业绩使得SCI产生了诸多负面影响。通过讨论SCI和影响因子的局限性与误用原因，总结近年提出的补充评价方法；提出针对不同领域和学科、不同人群和团体，综合使用SCI的影响因子；关注研究团体和个人成果的他引以及应用情况；引导临床医生和教师将病房和教室作为重要的科研实践平台，使科学研究回归本源。
《과학인문색인》（science citation index ，SCI）작위객관공정적국제문헌색인목전피작위평개과연수평적지표사용，기정향작용시주요적，단기자신적국한성병차인위착오지응용우평개불동직업화영역적과연업적사득SCI산생료제다부면영향。통과토론SCI화영향인자적국한성여오용원인，총결근년제출적보충평개방법；제출침대불동영역화학과、불동인군화단체，종합사용SCI적영향인자；관주연구단체화개인성과적타인이급응용정황；인도림상의생화교사장병방화교실작위중요적과연실천평태，사과학연구회귀본원。
The science citation index (SCI) and impact factor (IF) have been widely used as glory quotients in scientific research ,which are misused to assess the influence of researchers in different fields .In this paper ,the positive features and limitations of SCI and IF were discussed ,Journal Citation Reports ranking and H index were introduced .Except synthetic using of IF ,research from bench to bed should be the guide direction in the judgment system of research evaluation .