空军医学杂志
空軍醫學雜誌
공군의학잡지
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AIR FORCE
2014年
2期
99-101
,共3页
李彬%王凤岭%王贵法%穆展%张梦云
李彬%王鳳嶺%王貴法%穆展%張夢雲
리빈%왕봉령%왕귀법%목전%장몽운
呼气末正压通气%腹内压%测量
呼氣末正壓通氣%腹內壓%測量
호기말정압통기%복내압%측량
Positive end-expiratory pressure%Intra-abdominal pressure%Measurement
目的:探讨呼气末正压通气(positive end-expiratory pressure,PEEP)不同压力对腹内压(intra-abdominal pressure,IAP)测量的影响。方法采取前瞻性队列研究。2010年8月-2013年8月入住我院重症监护病房的患者15例,取仰卧位,比较不同呼气末正压通气时测得的两组IAP值(呼气末正压分别为5 cmH2O和10 cmH2O)。采用配对t检验和Bland-Altman统计方法进行统计学分析。结果 IAP5值范围11~20.6 mmHg,平均(15.56±2.46)mmHg,IAP10值范围11~20.6 mmHg,平均(15.68±2.36)mmHg,差异无统计学意义(P=0.18)。结论仰卧位机械通气患者,在PEEP值小于10 cmH2O条件下,PEEP改变对IAP测量无明显影响。
目的:探討呼氣末正壓通氣(positive end-expiratory pressure,PEEP)不同壓力對腹內壓(intra-abdominal pressure,IAP)測量的影響。方法採取前瞻性隊列研究。2010年8月-2013年8月入住我院重癥鑑護病房的患者15例,取仰臥位,比較不同呼氣末正壓通氣時測得的兩組IAP值(呼氣末正壓分彆為5 cmH2O和10 cmH2O)。採用配對t檢驗和Bland-Altman統計方法進行統計學分析。結果 IAP5值範圍11~20.6 mmHg,平均(15.56±2.46)mmHg,IAP10值範圍11~20.6 mmHg,平均(15.68±2.36)mmHg,差異無統計學意義(P=0.18)。結論仰臥位機械通氣患者,在PEEP值小于10 cmH2O條件下,PEEP改變對IAP測量無明顯影響。
목적:탐토호기말정압통기(positive end-expiratory pressure,PEEP)불동압력대복내압(intra-abdominal pressure,IAP)측량적영향。방법채취전첨성대렬연구。2010년8월-2013년8월입주아원중증감호병방적환자15례,취앙와위,비교불동호기말정압통기시측득적량조IAP치(호기말정압분별위5 cmH2O화10 cmH2O)。채용배대t검험화Bland-Altman통계방법진행통계학분석。결과 IAP5치범위11~20.6 mmHg,평균(15.56±2.46)mmHg,IAP10치범위11~20.6 mmHg,평균(15.68±2.36)mmHg,차이무통계학의의(P=0.18)。결론앙와위궤계통기환자,재PEEP치소우10 cmH2O조건하,PEEP개변대IAP측량무명현영향。
Objective To examine the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on the measurement of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). Method Prospective cohort study was taken. Fifteen mechanically ventilated patients were studied from August 2010 to August 2013 in the intensive care unit. All patients were studied with sequentially increasing PEEP (5 cm H2O and 10 cmH2O) during a PEEP-trial. The IAP measurements obtained at different PEEP values were compared using a paired t-test and Bland-Altman statistics. Results There’s no statistically significant difference between IAP5[(15.56±2.46)mmHg] and IAP10[(15.68±2.36)mmHg](P=0.18). Conclusions In the supine position, when the PEEP value was less than 10 cmH2O, PEEP changes did not obviously effect on IAP measurement.