CAJ | 학술논문

“有专门知识的人”参与刑事诉讼的制度具有保障当事人对鉴定意见的质证权、辅助法官对是否采信鉴定意见作出判断、使重新鉴定申请和决定依据更加充分等功能和价值。其积极作用的奏效，亟待解决如下理论问题：“有专门知识的人”的诉讼地位、中立性、意见效力、选任资格及启动程序等。“有专门知识的人”应界定为“专家辅助人”，属于广义的诉讼参与人。他们具有倾向性的问题，要完善启动和选任程序，确保其客观公正地提出意见。可由各省高院牵头成立“专家库”，由法庭根据控辩要求从中择优聘请。“有专门知识的人”出庭的费用由司法经费出资以确保其立场中立。
“유전문지식적인”삼여형사소송적제도구유보장당사인대감정의견적질증권、보조법관대시부채신감정의견작출판단、사중신감정신청화결정의거경가충분등공능화개치。기적겁작용적주효，극대해결여하이론문제：“유전문지식적인”적소송지위、중립성、의견효력、선임자격급계동정서등。“유전문지식적인”응계정위“전가보조인”，속우엄의적소송삼여인。타문구유경향성적문제，요완선계동화선임정서，학보기객관공정지제출의견。가유각성고원견두성립“전가고”，유법정근거공변요구종중택우빙청。“유전문지식적인”출정적비용유사법경비출자이학보기립장중립。
The New Criminal Procedure Law has established the system regarding persons with expertise ,this system positively helps to enhance the function of cross-examination of forensic appraisals ,fill the knowledge gap between experts and judges ,provide sufficient basis in the application and decision of re-identification . However ,it faces some problems such as the status of “persons with expertise” in litigation is not clear ,nei-ther are its neutral position principle and its qualification .T he determination process of this system and the va-lidity of its testimony need to be further studied .Based on analysis ,it was strongly recommended that “persons with expertise”should be regarded as participants in litigation .It is necessary to emphasize its professional eth-ics so as to guarantee a sound mechanism .It is a wise decision for higher people’s courts to establish “expert database” so as to provide experts for judges according to requirements of both parties .In order to guarantee its neutral position ,the cost for“persons with expertise”appearing in court should be paid by the judicial budget .