中国现代药物应用
中國現代藥物應用
중국현대약물응용
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN DRUG APPLICATION
2014年
16期
5-6
,共2页
QRS波时限%心力衰竭%脑钠肽%左束支传导阻滞%右束支传导阻滞
QRS波時限%心力衰竭%腦鈉肽%左束支傳導阻滯%右束支傳導阻滯
QRS파시한%심력쇠갈%뇌납태%좌속지전도조체%우속지전도조체
QRS complex duration%Heart failure%Brain natriuretic peptide%Left bundle branch block%Right bundle branch block
目的:探讨不同类型的QRS波增宽与N末端B型脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)水平及左心室射血分数(LVEF)的相关性。方法 QRS波时限>120 ms的慢性心力衰竭患者97例,根据QRS波分为左束支组47例、右束支组50例,非慢性心力衰竭且QRS波时限正常者40例作为对照组。分别测定NT-proBNP水平及LVEF。结果左束支组QRS波时限长于右束支组;左束支组、右束支组NT-proBNP水平明显高于对照组, LVEF低于对照组;左束支组NT-proBNP 高于右束支组, LVEF低于右束支组;差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。左束支型QRS波时限延长与血浆NT-proBNP水平呈正相关,与LVEF呈负相关。而右束支组QRS波时限延长与血浆NT-proBNP水平呈正相关,与LVEF无明显相关。结论左束支阻滞的QRS波时限延长与左室收缩功能下降及血浆NT-proBNP水平相关性良好,可以作为临床判断心力衰竭程度的一个简便指标。
目的:探討不同類型的QRS波增寬與N末耑B型腦鈉肽前體(NT-proBNP)水平及左心室射血分數(LVEF)的相關性。方法 QRS波時限>120 ms的慢性心力衰竭患者97例,根據QRS波分為左束支組47例、右束支組50例,非慢性心力衰竭且QRS波時限正常者40例作為對照組。分彆測定NT-proBNP水平及LVEF。結果左束支組QRS波時限長于右束支組;左束支組、右束支組NT-proBNP水平明顯高于對照組, LVEF低于對照組;左束支組NT-proBNP 高于右束支組, LVEF低于右束支組;差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。左束支型QRS波時限延長與血漿NT-proBNP水平呈正相關,與LVEF呈負相關。而右束支組QRS波時限延長與血漿NT-proBNP水平呈正相關,與LVEF無明顯相關。結論左束支阻滯的QRS波時限延長與左室收縮功能下降及血漿NT-proBNP水平相關性良好,可以作為臨床判斷心力衰竭程度的一箇簡便指標。
목적:탐토불동류형적QRS파증관여N말단B형뇌납태전체(NT-proBNP)수평급좌심실사혈분수(LVEF)적상관성。방법 QRS파시한>120 ms적만성심력쇠갈환자97례,근거QRS파분위좌속지조47례、우속지조50례,비만성심력쇠갈차QRS파시한정상자40례작위대조조。분별측정NT-proBNP수평급LVEF。결과좌속지조QRS파시한장우우속지조;좌속지조、우속지조NT-proBNP수평명현고우대조조, LVEF저우대조조;좌속지조NT-proBNP 고우우속지조, LVEF저우우속지조;차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。좌속지형QRS파시한연장여혈장NT-proBNP수평정정상관,여LVEF정부상관。이우속지조QRS파시한연장여혈장NT-proBNP수평정정상관,여LVEF무명현상관。결론좌속지조체적QRS파시한연장여좌실수축공능하강급혈장NT-proBNP수평상관성량호,가이작위림상판단심력쇠갈정도적일개간편지표。
Objective To investigate the relativity of different types of QRS complex duration (QRSd), N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods There were 97 patients of chronic heart failure with prolonged QRSd greater than 120 ms divided into two groups. According to the clinic types of QRSd, There were 47 cases in the left bundle branch block group (LBBB) and 50 cases in the right bundle branch block group (RBBB). A total of 40 cases without chronic heart failure and unnormal QRS complex duration were set as the control group. The level of NT-proBNP and LVEF were measured. Results The QRSd of LBBB was longer than that of RBBB. The level of NT-proBNP of both LBBB and RBBB were higher than that of the control group, while their LVEF were lower than that of the control group. The NT-proBNP of LBBB was higher than RBBB, and its LVEF was lower than RBBB. These differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The prolonged QRSd in LBBB was positively correlated with NT-proBNP, and was negatively correlated with LVEF. The prolonged QRSd in RBBB was positively correlated with NT-proBNP, but was not correlated with LVEF. Conclusion QRSd of left bundle branch block has good relativity with LVEF and NT-proBNP, and it can be used as a simple indicator of the level of heart failure.