CAJ | 학술논문

目的验证催眠对高低催眠感受性青少年的注意执行控制功能影响,为催眠技术临床应用提供依据.方法选取某高校艺术系2500名一年级学生,按随机数码表抽取1200名学生为研究对象,采用斯坦福团体催眠感受性量表C式(SGSSC)筛查高低催眠感受性组(高感受性组SGHSS≥7分,低感受性组SGHSS≤4分),每组64人.128名被试按匹配原则分4组(高感受性一催眠；高感受性一对照；低感受性—催眠；低感受性—对照组)；采用Stroop色-字干扰测试评估注意执行控制功能；E-prime 1.1版本用于呈现刺激序列；采用台湾廖阅鹏催眠音乐和录制言语听觉诱导催眠；统计处理:采用SPSS13.0软件包,进行方差分析(ANOVA)、卡方检验和t检验.结果 1.催眠前,Stroop色-字干扰测试,一致反应时、不一致反应时、中性反应时和错误数,4组间差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),组内3个刺激反应时比较,“不一致反应时”显著长于其他两组(P1-4=0.027,0.015,0.026,0.004).2.催眠后,Stroop色-字干扰测验,不一致反应时[分别为(731.38±102.72) ms,(853.25 ±211.26)ms,(848.81±157.59)ms,(851.69±102.08) ms]4组间差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).3.催眠前后比较,A组一致反应时[分别是[(799.50±172.80) ms,(679.25±113.78)ms],不一致反应时[分别是(993.50 ±299.04) ms,(731.38 ± 102.72) ms],中性刺激反应时[分别是(852.56±231.59)ms,(716.56±126.67)ms],错误数[分别是(3.63 ±2.31)ms,(1.06±0.85)m]差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论催眠提高了高催眠感受性个体注意执行控制功能,削减了Stoop干扰效应.
목적 험증최면대고저최면감수성청소년적주의집행공제공능영향,위최면기술림상응용제공의거.방법 선취모고교예술계2500명일년급학생,안수궤수마표추취1200명학생위연구대상,채용사탄복단체최면감수성량표C식(SGSSC)사사고저최면감수성조(고감수성조SGHSS≥7분,저감수성조SGHSS≤4분),매조64인.128명피시안필배원칙분4조(고감수성일최면；고감수성일대조；저감수성—최면；저감수성—대조조)；채용Stroop색-자간우측시평고주의집행공제공능；E-prime 1.1판본용우정현자격서렬；채용태만료열붕최면음악화록제언어은각유도최면；통계처리:채용SPSS13.0연건포,진행방차분석(ANOVA)、잡방검험화t검험.결과 1.최면전,Stroop색-자간우측시,일치반응시、불일치반응시、중성반응시화착오수,4조간차이무통계학의의(P＞0.05),조내3개자격반응시비교,“불일치반응시”현저장우기타량조(P1-4=0.027,0.015,0.026,0.004).2.최면후,Stroop색-자간우측험,불일치반응시[분별위(731.38±102.72) ms,(853.25 ±211.26)ms,(848.81±157.59)ms,(851.69±102.08) ms]4조간차이유통계학의의(P＜0.05).3.최면전후비교,A조일치반응시[분별시[(799.50±172.80) ms,(679.25±113.78)ms],불일치반응시[분별시(993.50 ±299.04) ms,(731.38 ± 102.72) ms],중성자격반응시[분별시(852.56±231.59)ms,(716.56±126.67)ms],착오수[분별시(3.63 ±2.31)ms,(1.06±0.85)m]차이유통계학의의(P＜0.05).결론 최면제고료고최면감수성개체주의집행공제공능,삭감료Stoop간우효응.
Objective To observe changes of executive control function under hypnosis for adolescents with the higher and the lower hypnotic susceptibility,and to provide scientific evidence of clinical application of hypnotic techniques.Methods The students randomly drawn 1200 during the 2500 students of arts university were served as study subjects.They were evaluated by C type of Stanford group hypnotic susceptibility scale (SGHSS:C),as results screen out higher and lower hypnotic susceptibility groups (higher,SGHSS score≥7 ; lower scores≤4),they separately was 64 students.Total 128 students were divided into 4 groups according with matching rule,namely higher hypnotic susceptibility (hypnosis groupand control group); lower hypnotic susceptibility (hypnosis group and control group).Executive control function was evaluated by Stroop color-word interference test,stimulus presentation was by E-prime 1.1 version ;Statistical analysis used SPSS13.0 version for t tests,Chiasqurea and ANOVA analysis.Results 1.Before hypnosis,there were no significant different during the four groups for Stroop color-word interference test in the consistent with reaction time,no-inconsistent stimulus responses time,Neutral reaction time and Error number(P1-4 ＞ 0.05).Comparison of the 3 stimulus response during the group,inconsistent response was significantly longer than the other two groups (P1-4 ＜ 0.05 or 0.01).2.After hypnosis,there was a significant different during the 4 groups (P ＜ 0.05) in consistent stimulus responses time (ABCD group separately was (731.38 ±102.72)ms; (853.25 ±211.26)ms; (848.81 ± 157.59)ms; (851.69 ± 102.08)ms).3.Compared before and the after hypnosis,there was significant difference during the 4 factors only in group A(P ＜0.05) in the consistent stimulus responses time(separately was (799.50 ±172.80)ms,(679.25 ±113.78) ms),no-consistent stimulus responses time (separately was (993.50 ± 299.04) ms,(731.38 ± 102.72)ms),neutral reaction time (separately was (852.56 ± 231.59) ms,(716.56 ± 126.67) ms),and error number (separately was(3.63 ±2.31)ms,(1.06 ±0.85)ms).Conclusion Stoop effect is disappear after hypnosis in higher hypnotic susceptibility persons,and executive control ability is enhanced after hypnosis in higher hypnotic susceptibility.