中国实用医药
中國實用醫藥
중국실용의약
CHINA PRACTICAL MEDICAL
2014年
20期
3-4,5
,共3页
黄淑媛%覃川平%黄丽雅%朱奋油%黄涌森%廖卫华%杨经纬%孔祥资
黃淑媛%覃川平%黃麗雅%硃奮油%黃湧森%廖衛華%楊經緯%孔祥資
황숙원%담천평%황려아%주강유%황용삼%료위화%양경위%공상자
脑瘫%吞咽障碍%评估量表
腦癱%吞嚥障礙%評估量錶
뇌탄%탄인장애%평고량표
Cerebral palsy%Dysphagia%Assessment scale
目的:通过探讨脑瘫吞咽障碍不同康复方案的疗效,找出合理的康复方案及评估康复效果的最佳时间点。方法150例脑瘫合并吞咽障碍的患儿随机分为A、B、C三组,于治疗前、治疗后3、6、12、18、24个月分别用量表1、量表4及量表7进行评分,并进行重复测量方差分析。结果①组内不同时间点评分比较:C组最先出现统计学差异,各组的评分均从6个月始分别与治疗前两两比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);②组间不同时间点评分的两两比较:A组与B组:量表1及量表4,24个月时差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);A组与C组3个量表差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);B组与C组:量表1,18个月始;量表4,12个月始和量表7,6个月始差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论间接策略+直接策略是脑瘫吞咽障碍比较经济有效的治疗方案。康复治疗6个月是评估疗效的最佳时间点。
目的:通過探討腦癱吞嚥障礙不同康複方案的療效,找齣閤理的康複方案及評估康複效果的最佳時間點。方法150例腦癱閤併吞嚥障礙的患兒隨機分為A、B、C三組,于治療前、治療後3、6、12、18、24箇月分彆用量錶1、量錶4及量錶7進行評分,併進行重複測量方差分析。結果①組內不同時間點評分比較:C組最先齣現統計學差異,各組的評分均從6箇月始分彆與治療前兩兩比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.01);②組間不同時間點評分的兩兩比較:A組與B組:量錶1及量錶4,24箇月時差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);A組與C組3箇量錶差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05);B組與C組:量錶1,18箇月始;量錶4,12箇月始和量錶7,6箇月始差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論間接策略+直接策略是腦癱吞嚥障礙比較經濟有效的治療方案。康複治療6箇月是評估療效的最佳時間點。
목적:통과탐토뇌탄탄인장애불동강복방안적료효,조출합리적강복방안급평고강복효과적최가시간점。방법150례뇌탄합병탄인장애적환인수궤분위A、B、C삼조,우치료전、치료후3、6、12、18、24개월분별용량표1、량표4급량표7진행평분,병진행중복측량방차분석。결과①조내불동시간점평분비교:C조최선출현통계학차이,각조적평분균종6개월시분별여치료전량량비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.01);②조간불동시간점평분적량량비교:A조여B조:량표1급량표4,24개월시차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);A조여C조3개량표차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05);B조여C조:량표1,18개월시;량표4,12개월시화량표7,6개월시차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론간접책략+직접책략시뇌탄탄인장애비교경제유효적치료방안。강복치료6개월시평고료효적최가시간점。
To discuss curative effect of different cerebral palsy dysphagia rehabilitation programs to find reasonable rehabilitation programs and the best time to assess the effect of rehabilitation. MethodsDivided 150 cases of cerebral palsy patients with dysphagia were randomly into group A , group B, group C. Before treatment, after 3-month, 6-month, 12-month,18-month and 24-month treatment, scale 1, scale 4 and scale 7 were respectively used to score, and repeated measures analysis of variance.Results①Score comparison in groups at different time,group C first appeared significant differences, Score comparison in all groups have highly significant difference between before treatment and 6 months after treatment(P<0.01). ②Pairwise comparison between groups at different time points: between group A and group B, there was significant difference in scale 1 and scale 4 scores after 24 months after treatment(P<0.05), there was no significant difference between group A and group C. Between group B and group C: there was significant difference in scale 1 scores form 18th months after treatment, in scale 4 scores from the 12th month after treatment and in scale 7 scores from the 6th months after treatment (P<0.05).ConclusionIndirect strategy+direct strategy are economic and effective method forcerebral palsy dysphagia rehabilitation, 6-month treatment is the best time to assess effect of rehabilitation.