医学信息
醫學信息
의학신식
MEDICAL INFORMATION
2014年
21期
111-111
,共1页
介入治疗%手术治疗%原发性肝癌
介入治療%手術治療%原髮性肝癌
개입치료%수술치료%원발성간암
Intervention%Surgical treatment%Primary carcinoma of rape
目的:对比采用应用介入治疗和手术治疗两种方式对患有原发性肝癌的患者进行治疗的临床效果进行研究分析。方法选择我院2009年1月~2011年12月收治的66例患有原发性肝癌的患者,根据采用的治疗方法分为两组,手术组33例,采用采用肝段或联合肝段、肝《或者半扦切除方式对手术组患者进行治疗,介入组33例采用介入检塞方案对介入组患者进行治疗。结果手术组患者肝癌治疗效果(总有效率90.91%)明显优于介入组(总有效率72.72%);治疗结束1年后肝癌复发率(18.18%)明显低于介入组(45.45%);3年内患者存活率(60.60%)明显高于介入组(48.48%)。结论应用手术治疗方式对患有原发性肝癌的患者进行治疗的临床效果明显高于采用介入治疗的临床效果,值得临床推广。
目的:對比採用應用介入治療和手術治療兩種方式對患有原髮性肝癌的患者進行治療的臨床效果進行研究分析。方法選擇我院2009年1月~2011年12月收治的66例患有原髮性肝癌的患者,根據採用的治療方法分為兩組,手術組33例,採用採用肝段或聯閤肝段、肝《或者半扢切除方式對手術組患者進行治療,介入組33例採用介入檢塞方案對介入組患者進行治療。結果手術組患者肝癌治療效果(總有效率90.91%)明顯優于介入組(總有效率72.72%);治療結束1年後肝癌複髮率(18.18%)明顯低于介入組(45.45%);3年內患者存活率(60.60%)明顯高于介入組(48.48%)。結論應用手術治療方式對患有原髮性肝癌的患者進行治療的臨床效果明顯高于採用介入治療的臨床效果,值得臨床推廣。
목적:대비채용응용개입치료화수술치료량충방식대환유원발성간암적환자진행치료적림상효과진행연구분석。방법선택아원2009년1월~2011년12월수치적66례환유원발성간암적환자,근거채용적치료방법분위량조,수술조33례,채용채용간단혹연합간단、간《혹자반천절제방식대수술조환자진행치료,개입조33례채용개입검새방안대개입조환자진행치료。결과수술조환자간암치료효과(총유효솔90.91%)명현우우개입조(총유효솔72.72%);치료결속1년후간암복발솔(18.18%)명현저우개입조(45.45%);3년내환자존활솔(60.60%)명현고우개입조(48.48%)。결론응용수술치료방식대환유원발성간암적환자진행치료적림상효과명현고우채용개입치료적림상효과,치득림상추엄。
Objective To compare the use of interventional therapy and surgery are two ways for patients with primary liver cancer clinical effects of treatment were analyzed. Methods 66 cases of patients with primary liver cancer in our hospital in January 2009-December 2011 were treated according to the treatment methods used are divided into two groups, 33 patients surgery, the use of combined liver using liver segment or segments, hepatic resection or semi-stick treatment for surgical patients in the intervention group 33 cases of embolism solutions for interventional treatment of patients in the intervention group. Results Treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma surgery group (total ef iciency of 90.91%) was significantly bet er than in the intervention group (total 72.72% ef iciency);treatment ends HCC recurrence rate (18.18%) was significantly lower than a year after the intervention group (45.45%); 3 year survival rate of patients (60.60%) was significantly higher than in the intervention group (48.48%). Conclusion Surgical treatment of patients with primary liver cancer treatment clinical ef ect was significantly higher than the clinical ef ect of interventional treatment, worthy of promotion.