中国社区医师
中國社區醫師
중국사구의사
Chinese Community Doctors
2014年
23期
84-84,86
,共2页
手足口病%热毒宁%单磷酸阿糖腺苷
手足口病%熱毒寧%單燐痠阿糖腺苷
수족구병%열독저%단린산아당선감
Hand foot and mouth disease%Reduning%Vidarabine monophosphate
目的:观察中医及西医分别治疗手足口病的临床疗效。方法:将128例手足口病患儿随机平分为中医组和西医组。中医组应用热毒宁治疗,西医组应用单磷酸阿糖腺苷治疗。观察两组退热时间、疱疹及口腔溃疡消退时间等指标,比较2种方法的治疗效果。结果:中医组退热时间明显优于西医组(P<0.05);西医组疱疹及口腔溃疡消退时间明显优于中医组(P<0.05);两组总有效率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:热毒宁和单磷酸阿糖腺苷治疗手足口病各有优点,两者治疗的总有效率无明显差异。
目的:觀察中醫及西醫分彆治療手足口病的臨床療效。方法:將128例手足口病患兒隨機平分為中醫組和西醫組。中醫組應用熱毒寧治療,西醫組應用單燐痠阿糖腺苷治療。觀察兩組退熱時間、皰疹及口腔潰瘍消退時間等指標,比較2種方法的治療效果。結果:中醫組退熱時間明顯優于西醫組(P<0.05);西醫組皰疹及口腔潰瘍消退時間明顯優于中醫組(P<0.05);兩組總有效率差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論:熱毒寧和單燐痠阿糖腺苷治療手足口病各有優點,兩者治療的總有效率無明顯差異。
목적:관찰중의급서의분별치료수족구병적림상료효。방법:장128례수족구병환인수궤평분위중의조화서의조。중의조응용열독저치료,서의조응용단린산아당선감치료。관찰량조퇴열시간、포진급구강궤양소퇴시간등지표,비교2충방법적치료효과。결과:중의조퇴열시간명현우우서의조(P<0.05);서의조포진급구강궤양소퇴시간명현우우중의조(P<0.05);량조총유효솔차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론:열독저화단린산아당선감치료수족구병각유우점,량자치료적총유효솔무명현차이。
To observe the clinical curative effect of traditional Chinese medicine and western medicine in the treatment of hand foot and mouth disease respectively.Methods:128 children with hand foot mouth disease were randomly divided into the traditional Chinese medicine group and western medicine group.Traditional Chinese medicine group used reduning treatment;the western medicine group were given vidarabine therapy.Then observe the cooling time,the extinction time of herpes and oral ulcer in two groups of children,and compare the efficacy of two groups.Results:The cooling time of traditional Chinese medicine group was better than that of western medicine group(P<0.05).The extinction time of herpes and oral ulcer of the western medicine group were shorter than those of the traditional Chinese medicine group(P<0.05).The total efficiency of two groups had no significant difference(P>0.05).Conclusion:In the treatment of hand foot and mouth disease,reduning and vidarabine monophosphate both have its own advantages,and the total effective rate had no obvious difference in two groups.