当代医学
噹代醫學
당대의학
CHINA CONTEMPORARY MEDICINE
2014年
23期
138-138,139
,共2页
蒙脱石散剂%保留灌肠%锌制剂%轮状病毒性肠炎%患儿
矇脫石散劑%保留灌腸%鋅製劑%輪狀病毒性腸炎%患兒
몽탈석산제%보류관장%자제제%륜상병독성장염%환인
Smecta%Retention enema%Zinc preparations%Rotavirus enteritis%Children
目的：观察蒙脱石散剂保留灌肠联合口服锌制剂治疗小儿轮状病毒性肠炎的临床效果。方法将梅州市妇幼保健院收治的200例轮状病毒性肠炎患儿按照随机数字表法均分成观察组和对照组（n=100）。对照组患儿采用常规治疗；观察组患儿在常规基础治疗上加用蒙脱石散剂保留灌肠联合口服锌制剂治疗；对2组患儿的起效时间和腹泻时间以及治愈时间等进行比较和分析。结果观察组在起效时间和腹泻时间以及治愈时间明显优于对照组。观察组显效64例，占64.0%；有效34例，占34.0%；无效2例，占2.0%；治疗有效率为98.0%。对照组显效50例，占50.0%；有效32例，占32.0%；无效18例，占18.0%；治疗有效率为82.0%。2组患儿治疗有效率比较，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论在临床上，对轮状病毒性肠炎住院患儿采用蒙脱石散剂保留灌肠联合口服锌制剂治疗，效果显著，操作简单，安全方便。
目的：觀察矇脫石散劑保留灌腸聯閤口服鋅製劑治療小兒輪狀病毒性腸炎的臨床效果。方法將梅州市婦幼保健院收治的200例輪狀病毒性腸炎患兒按照隨機數字錶法均分成觀察組和對照組（n=100）。對照組患兒採用常規治療；觀察組患兒在常規基礎治療上加用矇脫石散劑保留灌腸聯閤口服鋅製劑治療；對2組患兒的起效時間和腹瀉時間以及治愈時間等進行比較和分析。結果觀察組在起效時間和腹瀉時間以及治愈時間明顯優于對照組。觀察組顯效64例，佔64.0%；有效34例，佔34.0%；無效2例，佔2.0%；治療有效率為98.0%。對照組顯效50例，佔50.0%；有效32例，佔32.0%；無效18例，佔18.0%；治療有效率為82.0%。2組患兒治療有效率比較，差異有統計學意義（P<0.05）。結論在臨床上，對輪狀病毒性腸炎住院患兒採用矇脫石散劑保留灌腸聯閤口服鋅製劑治療，效果顯著，操作簡單，安全方便。
목적：관찰몽탈석산제보류관장연합구복자제제치료소인륜상병독성장염적림상효과。방법장매주시부유보건원수치적200례륜상병독성장염환인안조수궤수자표법균분성관찰조화대조조（n=100）。대조조환인채용상규치료；관찰조환인재상규기출치료상가용몽탈석산제보류관장연합구복자제제치료；대2조환인적기효시간화복사시간이급치유시간등진행비교화분석。결과관찰조재기효시간화복사시간이급치유시간명현우우대조조。관찰조현효64례，점64.0%；유효34례，점34.0%；무효2례，점2.0%；치료유효솔위98.0%。대조조현효50례，점50.0%；유효32례，점32.0%；무효18례，점18.0%；치료유효솔위82.0%。2조환인치료유효솔비교，차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。결론재림상상，대륜상병독성장염주원환인채용몽탈석산제보류관장연합구복자제제치료，효과현저，조작간단，안전방편。
Objective To analyze the clinical effect of smecta retention enema therapy combined with oral zinc preparations in pediatric patients hospitalized with rotavirus enteritis. Methods In the hospital, 200 patients grouped according to the random number table were divided into observation group and control group (n=100);Control group used conventional treatment;Observation group using smecta retention enema therapy combined with oral zinc preparations basis on treatment on regular treatment;Onset time and duration of diarrhea and healing time in two groups of patients were compared and analyzed. Results The onset time and duration of diarrhea and healing time in observation group were significantly better than the control group, in the observation group:64 cases were markedly, accounting for 64.0%;Effective 34 cases, accounting for 34.0%;2 cases, accounting for 2.0%;Treatment effective rate of 98.0%. Control group:50 cases markedly, accounting for 50.0%;Effective 32 cases, accounting for 32.0%;Ineffective in 18 cases, accounting for 18.0%;Therapeutic efficacy was 82.0%. Efficiency in two groups had significant difference (P<0.05). Conclusion For hospitalized children with rotavirus enteritis, using mecta retention enema combined with oral zinc preparations for treatment, the effect is significant,simple, safe and convenient.
