微循环学杂志
微循環學雜誌
미순배학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MICROCIRCULATION
2014年
3期
45-47
,共3页
王超%沈文状%韩娟%李岽健%张林
王超%瀋文狀%韓娟%李崠健%張林
왕초%침문상%한연%리동건%장림
沙培林%乳腺癌改良根治术%皮下积液
沙培林%乳腺癌改良根治術%皮下積液
사배림%유선암개량근치술%피하적액
Sapylin%Breast cancer modified radical mastectomy%Seroma
目的:观察沙培林腔内注射治疗乳腺癌改良根治术后皮下积液的疗效及安全性。方法:选择行乳腺癌改良根治术后发生皮下积液患者60例,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组30例。观察组行抽净积液后腔内注射沙培林混合液,3h后抽净药液,再用绷带加压包扎积液创面;对照组仅以50%葡萄糖腔内注射,其余步骤相同。观察两组皮下积液改善的效果以及发热和局部皮肤坏死等不良反应。结果:治疗前两组积液量差异无统计学意义(164.45±36.22ml vs 172.41±45.37ml,P>0.05);第一次治疗后和第二次治疗后,观察组积液量均少于对照组(55.43±36.29ml vs 132.31±41.65ml,18.39±15.47ml vs 69.42±38.75ml;P<0.05),积液完全消失时间(3.22±0.64天 vs 11.84±1.83天)明显短于对照组(P<0.05)。两组发热率均为3.33%(1/30),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),均未发生皮肤坏死事件。结论:局部腔内注射沙培林可很快减少乳腺癌改良根治术后皮下积液,且使用方便、安全。
目的:觀察沙培林腔內註射治療乳腺癌改良根治術後皮下積液的療效及安全性。方法:選擇行乳腺癌改良根治術後髮生皮下積液患者60例,隨機分為觀察組和對照組,每組30例。觀察組行抽淨積液後腔內註射沙培林混閤液,3h後抽淨藥液,再用繃帶加壓包扎積液創麵;對照組僅以50%葡萄糖腔內註射,其餘步驟相同。觀察兩組皮下積液改善的效果以及髮熱和跼部皮膚壞死等不良反應。結果:治療前兩組積液量差異無統計學意義(164.45±36.22ml vs 172.41±45.37ml,P>0.05);第一次治療後和第二次治療後,觀察組積液量均少于對照組(55.43±36.29ml vs 132.31±41.65ml,18.39±15.47ml vs 69.42±38.75ml;P<0.05),積液完全消失時間(3.22±0.64天 vs 11.84±1.83天)明顯短于對照組(P<0.05)。兩組髮熱率均為3.33%(1/30),差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),均未髮生皮膚壞死事件。結論:跼部腔內註射沙培林可很快減少乳腺癌改良根治術後皮下積液,且使用方便、安全。
목적:관찰사배림강내주사치료유선암개량근치술후피하적액적료효급안전성。방법:선택행유선암개량근치술후발생피하적액환자60례,수궤분위관찰조화대조조,매조30례。관찰조행추정적액후강내주사사배림혼합액,3h후추정약액,재용붕대가압포찰적액창면;대조조부이50%포도당강내주사,기여보취상동。관찰량조피하적액개선적효과이급발열화국부피부배사등불량반응。결과:치료전량조적액량차이무통계학의의(164.45±36.22ml vs 172.41±45.37ml,P>0.05);제일차치료후화제이차치료후,관찰조적액량균소우대조조(55.43±36.29ml vs 132.31±41.65ml,18.39±15.47ml vs 69.42±38.75ml;P<0.05),적액완전소실시간(3.22±0.64천 vs 11.84±1.83천)명현단우대조조(P<0.05)。량조발열솔균위3.33%(1/30),차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),균미발생피부배사사건。결론:국부강내주사사배림가흔쾌감소유선암개량근치술후피하적액,차사용방편、안전。
Objective:To evaluate safety and clinical efficacy of Sapylin in the treatment of postoperative seroma after breast cancer modified radical mastectomy.Method:60 patients with postoperative seroma after breast cancer modi-fied radical mastectomy were included.These patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group,30 cases in each group.In control group,while additional articular injection Sapylin treatment in observation group;they underwent conventional fluid drainage + bandaged.Seroma improvement after breast cancer modified radical mastectomy,fever,local skin necrosis and so on adverse reactions were compared between two groups.Re-sults:The two groups showed no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative fever (3.33% vs 3.33%,P>0.05),skin necrosis did not occur (0% vs 0%,P>0.05).Effusion differences between the two groups before treatment was not statistically significant(164.45±36.22ml vs 172.41±45.37ml,P>0.05);After the first and second treatment,effusion in the observation group was significantly less than the control group (55.43±36.29ml vs 132.31±41.65ml,18.39±15.47ml vs 69.42±38.75ml,P<0.05)Conclusion:Articular injection Sapylin can significantly shorten the duration of treatment of postoperative seroma after breast cancer modified radical mastecto-my.It is easy to use and it is safe.