肿瘤预防与治疗
腫瘤預防與治療
종류예방여치료
JOURNAL OF CANCER CONTROL AND TREATMENT
2014年
3期
120-125
,共6页
黎杰%康盛伟%谭志博%王俊超%廖雄飞%王培
黎傑%康盛偉%譚誌博%王俊超%廖雄飛%王培
려걸%강성위%담지박%왕준초%료웅비%왕배
再放疗%脉冲式低剂量率%调强放射治疗
再放療%脈遲式低劑量率%調彊放射治療
재방료%맥충식저제량솔%조강방사치료
Reirradiation%Pulsed Low Dose Rate ( PLDR)%PLDR-IMRT
目的:设计一种用于复发的胰腺癌和前列腺癌放射治疗的PLDR-IMRT计划。方法:选择10例复发胰腺癌和10例复发前列腺癌患者,每个计划设置10个非共面射野,采用各种优化手段使得计划满足PLDR治疗的要求。并与三维适形(PLDR-3DCRT)计划和旋转调强(PLDR-ARC)计划比较。结果:胰腺癌PLDR-IMRT计划中,每个单独的射野中PTV的平均剂量在17.6cGy到22.4cGy之间,最大剂量的范围从22.9cGy到34.8cGy。前列腺癌病例中,PTV在每个单独的射野中的平均剂量在18.8cGy 到22.6cGy 之间,最大剂量的范围从24.0cGy 到34.7cGy。 IMRT计划中危及器官的剂量大大小于三维适形计划,接近旋转调强计划。结论:在脉冲式低剂量率放射治疗中,通过优化的设计,IMRT计划相对于通常使用的3DCRT计划更有优势,在保证靶区剂量的基础上降低了危及器官受量。
目的:設計一種用于複髮的胰腺癌和前列腺癌放射治療的PLDR-IMRT計劃。方法:選擇10例複髮胰腺癌和10例複髮前列腺癌患者,每箇計劃設置10箇非共麵射野,採用各種優化手段使得計劃滿足PLDR治療的要求。併與三維適形(PLDR-3DCRT)計劃和鏇轉調彊(PLDR-ARC)計劃比較。結果:胰腺癌PLDR-IMRT計劃中,每箇單獨的射野中PTV的平均劑量在17.6cGy到22.4cGy之間,最大劑量的範圍從22.9cGy到34.8cGy。前列腺癌病例中,PTV在每箇單獨的射野中的平均劑量在18.8cGy 到22.6cGy 之間,最大劑量的範圍從24.0cGy 到34.7cGy。 IMRT計劃中危及器官的劑量大大小于三維適形計劃,接近鏇轉調彊計劃。結論:在脈遲式低劑量率放射治療中,通過優化的設計,IMRT計劃相對于通常使用的3DCRT計劃更有優勢,在保證靶區劑量的基礎上降低瞭危及器官受量。
목적:설계일충용우복발적이선암화전렬선암방사치료적PLDR-IMRT계화。방법:선택10례복발이선암화10례복발전렬선암환자,매개계화설치10개비공면사야,채용각충우화수단사득계화만족PLDR치료적요구。병여삼유괄형(PLDR-3DCRT)계화화선전조강(PLDR-ARC)계화비교。결과:이선암PLDR-IMRT계화중,매개단독적사야중PTV적평균제량재17.6cGy도22.4cGy지간,최대제량적범위종22.9cGy도34.8cGy。전렬선암병례중,PTV재매개단독적사야중적평균제량재18.8cGy 도22.6cGy 지간,최대제량적범위종24.0cGy 도34.7cGy。 IMRT계화중위급기관적제량대대소우삼유괄형계화,접근선전조강계화。결론:재맥충식저제량솔방사치료중,통과우화적설계,IMRT계화상대우통상사용적3DCRT계화경유우세,재보증파구제량적기출상강저료위급기관수량。
Objective: To investigate the planning techniques for IMRT-based PLDR treatment for recurrent pan-creatic and prostate cancer cases. Methods:Ten cases of recurrent recurrent pancreatic and 10 cases of prostate cancer pa-tients were included in this study. Treatment plans were generated with 10 gantry angles using the step-and-shot delivery technique, which can be delivered in three-minute intervals to achieve an effective low-dose rate. The IMRT plans were compared with the 3DCRT plans and ARC plans. Results:For the ten pancreas cases investigated, the mean PTV dose for each gantry angle in the IMRT plans ranged from 17. 6 cGy to 22. 4 cGy. The maximum doses ranged between 22. 9 cGy and 34. 8 cGy. For the ten prostate cases investigated, the mean PTV doses for individual gantry angles ranged from 18. 8 cGy to 22. 6 cGy. The maximum doses per gantry angle were between 24. 0 cGy and 34. 7 cGy. A significant reduction in the OAR dose was achieved with IMRT compared with 3DCRT. Conclusion:Compared with 3DCRT, IMRT could provide superior target coverage and normal tissue sparing for PLDR reirradiation of recurrent pancreatic and prostate cancers.