医院管理论坛
醫院管理論罈
의원관이론단
HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT FORUM
2014年
6期
60-62
,共3页
一次性水封瓶%更换时间%胸腔感染%临床意义
一次性水封瓶%更換時間%胸腔感染%臨床意義
일차성수봉병%경환시간%흉강감염%림상의의
Disposable water-seal bottle%Replacing interval%Thoracic infection%Clinical significance
目的探讨更换一次性水封瓶时间长短与胸腔感染的临床意义。方法对404例行胸腔闭式引流而且排除胸腔感染者使用随机数字表分为4组,同时对404例患者的胸腔内积液或胸腔引流管前端2厘米进行细菌培养[1],最后进行统计学分析。结果一次性水封瓶内生理盐水的细菌培养均为阴性,4组水封瓶中胸腔引流液的细菌培养结果阳性共14例,各组比较差异均无显著性(P>0.05)。结论一次性水封瓶的更换时间与胸腔感染无直接关系,水封瓶更换时间与水封瓶内细菌定植无明显相关性,在严格无菌操作下,对于胸腔引流管留置时间较长的患者,一次性水封瓶以每周更换一次较为合适。
目的探討更換一次性水封瓶時間長短與胸腔感染的臨床意義。方法對404例行胸腔閉式引流而且排除胸腔感染者使用隨機數字錶分為4組,同時對404例患者的胸腔內積液或胸腔引流管前耑2釐米進行細菌培養[1],最後進行統計學分析。結果一次性水封瓶內生理鹽水的細菌培養均為陰性,4組水封瓶中胸腔引流液的細菌培養結果暘性共14例,各組比較差異均無顯著性(P>0.05)。結論一次性水封瓶的更換時間與胸腔感染無直接關繫,水封瓶更換時間與水封瓶內細菌定植無明顯相關性,在嚴格無菌操作下,對于胸腔引流管留置時間較長的患者,一次性水封瓶以每週更換一次較為閤適。
목적탐토경환일차성수봉병시간장단여흉강감염적림상의의。방법대404례행흉강폐식인류이차배제흉강감염자사용수궤수자표분위4조,동시대404례환자적흉강내적액혹흉강인류관전단2전미진행세균배양[1],최후진행통계학분석。결과일차성수봉병내생리염수적세균배양균위음성,4조수봉병중흉강인류액적세균배양결과양성공14례,각조비교차이균무현저성(P>0.05)。결론일차성수봉병적경환시간여흉강감염무직접관계,수봉병경환시간여수봉병내세균정식무명현상관성,재엄격무균조작하,대우흉강인류관류치시간교장적환자,일차성수봉병이매주경환일차교위합괄。
Objective To investigate the correlation between the replacing interval of disposable water-seal bottle and thoracic infections. Methods 404 patients with thoracic closed drainage and without thoracic infections at the beginning participated in this study. Patients were randomly divided into 4 groups according to random number table. Bacterial culture was performed for normal saline and drainage fluid in the water-seal bottle as well as the thoracic transudate or effusion in 2 cm length of the drainage tube end. The results were compared statistically. Results Bacterium was not found in normal saline in the disposable water-seal bottle but was found in 14 drainage fluid specimens from 4 groups and totally 8 kinds of bacterium were found. The bacteria were firstly found in Group A when it was the third time to replace the bottle (on the third day). Group C is the last group to be found bacteria when it was the second time to replace the bottle (on the fourteenth day). No significant difference was found among the four groups (P>0. 05). Bacteria were found in 2 of 404 cases with bacterial culture of thoracic transudate or effusion in 2 cm length of the drainage tube end. The bacteria type of one case was the same with the drainage fluid in the disposable water-seal bottle while the other was different. Conclusion The replacing interval of water-seal bottle has no obvious correlation with thoracic infection and bacterium reproduction in the bottle. To replace the water-seal bottle every 7 days is reasonable for those patients requiring longer chest tube placement.