CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨不同理论模型中成功老龄化（SA）的影响因素。方法随机抽取某疗养院230名老年人，通过问卷调查和量表评估收集相关数据，并采用二元逻辑回归对不同理论模型的影响因素进行分析比较。结果86名老年人满足 SA 三维（患病状况-身心功能-社会功能）模型标准，占37.39％；51名老年人满足 SA 四维模型标准（患病状况-身心功能-社会功能-主观幸福），占22.17％。年龄和受教育程度2个因素在 SA 三维模型下预测效用达到显著性水平，可解释总变异的69.10％。年龄、心理韧性和主观支持3个因素在 SA 四维模型下预测效用达到显著性水平，可解释总变异的79.12％。结论SA 影响因素分析受理论模型影响较大。
목적：탐토불동이론모형중성공노령화（SA）적영향인소。방법수궤추취모요양원230명노년인，통과문권조사화량표평고수집상관수거，병채용이원라집회귀대불동이론모형적영향인소진행분석비교。결과86명노년인만족 SA 삼유（환병상황-신심공능-사회공능）모형표준，점37.39％；51명노년인만족 SA 사유모형표준（환병상황-신심공능-사회공능-주관행복），점22.17％。년령화수교육정도2개인소재 SA 삼유모형하예측효용체도현저성수평，가해석총변이적69.10％。년령、심리인성화주관지지3개인소재 SA 사유모형하예측효용체도현저성수평，가해석총변이적79.12％。결론SA 영향인소분석수이론모형영향교대。
Objective To explore the differences between two successful aging models including three -dimensional model and four -dimensional model by comparing the influencing factors.Methods A total of 230 elderly people in sanatorium were selected by random sampling method.Then questionnaires and scales were conducted and the influencing factors of the two theoretical models were tested by binary logical regression analysis.Results 86 elderly people (37.39%)were qualified as successful aging by three -dimensional model (chronic illness,physical and psychological functions,social functions)while 51 elderly people (22.17%)were qualified by four -dimensional model (chronic illness,physical and psychological functions,social function,subjective well -being).When using three -dimensional model,two factors reached significant level on successful aging phenomenon:age and education background,which could explain 69.10% of the total variance.When using four -dimensional model,three factors finally showed the significance:age,psychological resilience and subjective support,which could explain 79.12% of total variance.Conclusion The qualification of successful aging status can be largely influenced by evaluation models.